Home Email this page Print this page Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size
Noise & Health  
 CURRENT ISSUE    PAST ISSUES    AHEAD OF PRINT    SEARCH   GET E-ALERTS    
 
 Next article
 Previous article
Table of Contents

Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Citation Manager
Access Statistics
Reader Comments
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed8233    
    Printed224    
    Emailed6    
    PDF Downloaded205    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 

 ARTICLES
Year : 2000  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 67--78

A clinical evaluation of the hearing disability and handicap scale in men with noise induced hearing loss


Department of Audiology, Sahlgren's University Hospital,University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden

Correspondence Address:
Marie-Louise Barrenas
Department of Audiology, Sahlgren's University Hospital, Gröna Stråket 11, S-413 45 Göteborg
Sweden
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 12689480

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

During the last 30 years several hearing disability and handicap questionnaires have been designed and used for clinical purposes. The present study includes a review of the most frequently used scales. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Hearing Disability and Handicap Scale (HDHS), which is a shortened and modified version of the Hearing Measurement Scale. Correlations between the Hearing Handicap and Support Scale, the Communication Strategy Scale from the Communication Profile of the Hearing Impaired, pure tone audiometry and speech recognition scores in noise were analysed. Data from 168 men with noise induced hearing loss of different degrees was obtained. Also a test-retest was conducted. The disability section of the HDHS seemed accurate but offered no improvement of prediction compared to previous scales. Even though the reliability of the handicap section was sufficient, its validity and clinical use is discussed and suggestions about improvements given. Since standardised scales are necessary if results are to be compared worldwide, guidelines regarding the clinical use and benefit of hearing disability and handicap scales are required.






[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*


        
Print this article     Email this article