Home Email this page Print this page Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size
Noise & Health  
 CURRENT ISSUE    PAST ISSUES    AHEAD OF PRINT    SEARCH   GET E-ALERTS    
 
 Next article
 Previous article
Table of Contents

Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Citation Manager
Access Statistics
Reader Comments
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed7828    
    Printed246    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded165    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 12    

Recommend this journal

 

 ARTICLES
Year : 2002  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 14  |  Page : 49--61

Chemical asphyxiants and noise


Center for Toxicology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center,Oklahoma City OK 73190, USA

Correspondence Address:
Laurence D Fechter
Center for Toxicology, The University of Oklahoma, Health Sciences Center, P.O. Box 26901, Oklahoma City, OK 73190
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 12678928

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

The damaging effects of noise on auditory function can be altered significantly by exposure to additional agents that may or may not by themselves be ototoxic. This chapter focuses on the ability of chemical asphyxiants present in both occupational settings and ambient environments to potentiate noise induced hearing loss in a laboratory animal model. Since the chemical agents under study do not produce permanent impairment of hearing by themselves, the finding of auditory impairment in excess of that which is produced by noise exposure alone can be defined as noise potentiation. This chapter focuses both on the exposure conditions that favour such potentiation and also on potential mechanisms for potentiation. The data show that low to moderate exposure levels of carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrogen cyanide can potentiate noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) and the relationship between such levels and those permitted in work environments is provided. Finally, evidence is presented that free oxygen radicals may be responsible for potentiation of NIHL by the chemical asphyxiants. First, the ability of a free radical spin trap agent, PBN, to prevent the adverse effects of CO is demonstrated. Then, in an additional experiment, electron paramagnetic spin resonance is used to demonstrate a high level of free radicals in the cochlea with combined exposure to CO + noise while individual exposures to CO and noise do not produce free radicals at levels detectable by this method.






[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*


        
Print this article     Email this article