Home Email this page Print this page Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size
Noise & Health  
 CURRENT ISSUE    PAST ISSUES    SEARCH   GET E-ALERTS    
 
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


 
   Abstract
   Introduction
   Occupational noise
   Leisure noise an...
   Conclusion
   References
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed10854    
    Printed322    
    Emailed14    
    PDF Downloaded434    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 28    

Recommend this journal

 


 
ARTICLES Table of Contents   
Year : 2003  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 18  |  Page : 25-30
Does health promotion work in relation to noise?

Rikshospitalet University Clinic, Oslo, Norway

Click here for correspondence address and email
 
  Abstract 

Noise is a health risk. The only scientifically established adverse health effect of noise is noise­induced hearing loss (NIHL). Besides noise may affect quality of life and cause annoyance and sleep disturbance. The present scientific evidence of potential non-auditory effects of noise on health is quite weak. Whether health promotion works in relation to noise may be reflected by permanent hearing threshold shift development in population studies. Hearing impairment continues to be the most prevalent disability in Western societies. The National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) still rates noise induced hearing loss among the top ten work-related problems. Recent studies report that employees continue to develop noise induced hearing loss although to a lesser extent than before, in spite of occupational hearing conservation programmes. Besides socio-acusis and leisure noise seem to be an increasing hazard to hearing, also in young children and adolescents. This seems partly related to acute leisure noise exposure (e.g. toy pistols, amplified music). However, population studies increasingly find non­normal high-frequency hearing including the characteristic NIHL-"notch" around 6kHz also in subjects who do not report noise exposure incidents or activities. Today 12.5% of US children 6-19 years show a noise-"notch" in one or both ears (n= 5249, Niskar et al 2001). A Norwegian county audiometry survey on adults > 20 years (n=51.975) showed mean unscreened thresholds +10dB at 6kHz for both genders even for the youngest age group 20-24 years (Borchgrevink et al 2001). Accordingly, the present health promotion initiatives seem insufficient in relation to noise and noise-induced hearing loss.

Keywords: Noise, hearing, hearing loss, leisure noise, socio-acusis.

How to cite this article:
Borchgrevink H M. Does health promotion work in relation to noise?. Noise Health 2003;5:25-30

How to cite this URL:
Borchgrevink H M. Does health promotion work in relation to noise?. Noise Health [serial online] 2003 [cited 2014 Dec 20];5:25-30. Available from: http://www.noiseandhealth.org/text.asp?2003/5/18/25/31821

  Introduction Top


The present scientific evidence of potential non­auditory effects of noise on health is quite weak - too weak to influence standards and regulations (Porter et al., 1998). Noise may affect quality of life and cause annoyance and sleep disturbance. The only scientifically established adverse health effect of noise is noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). An evaluation of whether health promotion works in relation to noise should accordingly be based on an adequate outcome parameter for NIHL, i.e. permanent hearing threshold shift development reflected in population studies. Hearing impairment continues to be the most prevalent disability in Western societies (Davis, 1997; Wilson et al., 1999). It is estimated that 11% of the total population in the US and Europe are at risk for hearing loss from noise (Alberti, 1998).


  Occupational noise Top


The National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), USA, still rates noise induced hearing loss among the top ten work­related problems, involving at least 11 million workers in the US (Ishii and Talbott, 1998). Recent studies report that employees continue to develop noise induced hearing loss in spite of hearing conservation programmes. In the military, Swiss conscripts showed significant changes in otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) at 2kHz and 4kHz after 17 weeks training (Hotz et al., 1993). German recruits showed permanent NIHL >25 dB for a percentage of the group after 2 months training (Joachims et al., 1993). Finnish conscripts demonstrated a deterioration of 5 dB median hearing loss 2-8 kHz (Kiukaanniemi et al., 1992). In UK, NIHL is still the single largest category of disability seen after military service with a 28 % prevalence of acoustic trauma in the British Army, despite the Hearing Conservation Programme initiated in 1965 (Bennett and Kersebaum, 1996). Occupational NIHL remains epidemic in the US Air Force aircrew members and radio operators (Ritter and Perkins, 2001). In the US, Navy and Marine Corps men still have worse hearing threshold levels than Occupational Safety and Health Administration age-corrected values throughout most of their careers (Bohnker et al. 2002a). Compared with historical data significant threshold shifts were though lower for the most junior enlisted personnel, indicating improved protection in later years (Bohnker et al., 2002b).


  Leisure noise and socio-acusis Top


Socio-acusis and leisure noise seem to be an increasing hazard to hearing, also in young children and adolescents. This seems partly related to acute leisure noise exposure (e.g. toy pistols, amplified music). Noise typically leads to high-frequency hearing loss with largest threshold shifts, a "notch" around 3-6 kHz. Pop­music tends to give the largest threshold shift at 6 kHz (Passchier-Vermeer et al., 1998).

Estimates of risk of NIHL from amplified music claim that around 10% of young people are expected to suffer a 10 dB NIHL at 3 kHz in both ear after 10 years of amplified music exposure (Hoffmann, 1997). The high-frequency hearing loss from music listening through headphones has been estimated to 20 dB in 5% of teenagers after 5 years (Ising et al., 1994). A Dutch study which found listening levels under headphones to be 10-15 dB lower in 1997 than estimated in 1989, concluded that pop-music had caused a 3 dB average loss at 4 and 6 kHz in 6.5% of young persons - which corresponds to the age-related threshold shift recorded from 20 to 30 years (Passchier-Vermeer et al., 1998).

Music listening by headphones may lead to temporary threshold shifts (TTS) (e.g. Turunen­Rise et al., 1991; Hellstrom et al., 1998) and permanent threshold shift (PTS) (e.g., Fearn and Hanson, 1984; Katz et al., 1982; Mori, 1985; Meyer-Bisch, 1996; Mercier et al., 1998). Other studies claim no influence on PTS (Wong et al., 1990; Hellstrom, 1991; Mostafapour et al., 1998) (studies that emphasise mean high-frequency shifts rather than "notches" will implicitly conceal NIHL effects and favour age effects in their interpretation of data). TTS is also reported after music exposure in aerobic class (Nassar, 2001). Tinnitus, a symptom of both temporary and permanent noise-induced threshold shift, has been reported in up to 2/3 of discotheque visitors (Meyer-Bisch, 1996; Mercier et al., 1998, Maassen et al, 2001), the prevalence being higher for those attending the noisier discotheques (Tin and Lim, 2000). Repeated TTS is regarded to lead to a corresponding PTS (NATO, 1986). US-NCHS indicated effects of music-induced hearing loss beginning in the late 1960s (Jekel, 1996). High-frequency hearing loss is still significantly associated with noisy leisure activities in general (Dalton et al., 2001), e.g. recreational firearm use (Nondahl et al., 2000; Stewart et al., 2001). Acute acoustic trauma may be seen in young people even after short term or incidental noise exposure, e.g. toy pistol firing (Fleischer et al., 1999) and loud amplified music (Metternich and Brusis, 1999).

Non-normal high-frequency permanent threshold shifts have been recorded in children at start of school (Kruppa et al., 1995), in adolescents in Austria (Korpert, 1992), Germany (Becher et al., 1996; Struwe et al., 1996; Ising and Babisch, 1998), France (Meyer-Bisch, 1996; Mercier et al., 1998), Japan (Inoue et al., 1996) and the Netherlands (Passchier-Vermeer et al., 1998); in studies on young adults 15-45 years in Australia (Murray & LePage, 1993), and in conscripts at entry in Sweden (Rosenhall et al., 1993), Norway: increasing in the 1980's, declining in the 1990's (Borchgrevink, 1988; 1993), Canada (Pelausa et al., 1995), Germany (Hoffmann, 1997) and Italy (Merluzzi et al., 1997).

In audiometric surveys from various countries the median hearing threshold levels of any group of 18-20 year olds, are not zero dB, but on the order of + 5 dB for most frequencies 0.25-8 kHz and with higher values (e.g., 13.5 dB) for 6 kHz (extensively discussed by Ward, 1990; 1993). In UK, adults 18-30 years show 4.3 dB poorer thresholds than "audiometric zero" (ISO 389, 1994) for the average of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz with even greater shifts for 0.25, 6 and 8 kHz (Lutman and Davis 1994). Recent studies showing a 6 kHz noise "notch" include 22+28% of college student volunteers (Mostafapour et al., 1998) and in median thresholds of classical orchestral musicians, males (a) and females (b) (Kahari et al., 2001 a+b). In electrical transmission workers the 4 kHz shift registered in 4% correlated with reported noise exposure (questionnaire) while the 6 kHz shift in 31% did not (McBride and Williams, 2001).

Even large population studies increasingly find non-normal high-frequency hearing including the characteristic NIHL-"notch" around 6kHz, also in subjects who do not report noise exposure incidents or activities. Today 12.5% of US children 6-19 years show a noise-"notch" in one or both ears (n=5249, Niskar et al., 2001). A Norwegian county audiometry survey on adults > 20 years (n=51.975) showed mean unscreened thresholds +10dB at 6kHz for both genders even for the youngest age group 20-24 years. The elevated prevalence for > 25 dB loss at 6 kHz in the better ear, present for both genders but most expressed for the younger males (Borchgrevink et al., 2001), is in line with the corresponding threshold elevation found for Australian young adults 15-45 years (Murray and LePage, 1993) and can not be explained by calibration error (see below). It agrees with the various reports on high-frequency threshold elevation in young adults (predominantly males) and is indicative of slight noise-related socio-acusis, most likely partly due to music noise.

If the recorded high-frequency thresholds shifts do not reflect true hearing loss, the "audiometric zero" (normal threshold for young adults) must be too restrictive. Parts of the threshold elevation might possibly be due to calibration error related to the introduction of the ISO 389 (1994) standard, which includes use of artificial ear (Smith and Lutman, 1992). The 6 kHz "notch" has been claimed to be related to directional phenomena of sound from the headset in the ear canal. If so, one must explain why this did not influence the previous population studies underlying the 6 kHz "audiometric zero" (ISO 389, 1994), and how it can be so prevalent across studies in children and adults using headsets from different manufacturers.


  Conclusion Top


From the above it seems reasonable to conclude that the high-frequency hearing threshold shifts, including the 6 kHz "notch", being recorded in large fractions of subjects in a number of studies including large population surveys, reflect a true noise induced hearing deterioration affecting a large fraction of the population. As these threshold shifts are seen even in young subjects unexposed to occupational noise, people are at risk for noise-induced hearing loss due to socio­acusis - the general noise exposure experienced as a Western citizen - including leisure noise, e.g. weapon noise and amplified music. Populations at risk should be monitored by sensitive methods, e.g. otoacoustic emission (OAE), by conventional TEOAE, or using maximum length sequences TEOAE-MLS (Hall and Lutman, 1999) or distortion products DPOAE (Marshall et al., 2001). Aged subjects seem more susceptible due to impaired spontaneuos repair mechanisms (Miller et al., 1998), especially those with a prior NIHL history (Gates et al., 2000; 2001). Age and noise effects do not seem to be simply additive and individual susceptibility differences are substantial (Mills et al., 1998; 2001). Race and ethnicity, and possibly socioeconomy, also seem to influence susceptibility (Rosen et al., 1964; Clark and Bohl, 1996; Lee et al., 1996; Ishii and Talbott, 1998).

Accordingly, at present health promotion initiatives seem insufficient regarding prevention of noise-induced hearing loss.[68]

 
  References Top

1.Alberti P.W. (1998) Editorial: Noise, the most ubiquitous pollutant. Noise & Health 1:3-5.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Becher S., Struwe F., Schwenzer C., Weber K. (1996) Risk of hearing loss caused by high volume music- presenting an educational concept for preventing hearing loss in adolescents. [German]. Gesundheitswesen 58(2): 91-95  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Bennett J.D.C., Kersebaum M. (1996) The effects of military noise on hearing. Paper presented to the 5. Int Symp Effects of Noise on Hearing, Gothenburg 12.-14. May,1994.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Bohnker B.K., Page J.C., Rovig G., Betts L.S., Muller J.G., Sack D.M. (2002a). US Navy and Marine Corps Hearing Conservation Program: mean hearing thresholds for enlisted personnel by gender and age groups. Mil Med 167(2):132-135.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Bohnker B.K., Page J.C., Rovig G., Betts L.S., Muller J.G., Sack D.M. (2002b). Navy Hearing Conservation Program: threshold shifts in enlisted personnel, 1995-1999. Mil Med 167(1):48-52.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Borchgrevink H.M. (1988). One third of Norwegian 18 year old males conscripts show noise-induced hearing loss > 20 dB before start of military service - the incidence being doubled since 1981. Reflecting increased leisure noise? In Berglund B., Berglund U., Karlsson J., Lindvall T., eds. Proceedings of the 5th international congress on noise as a public health problem, Council for Building Research, Stockholm vol 2, pp27-32.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Borchgrevink H.M. (1993) Music-induced hearing loss > 20 dB affects 30% of Norwegian 18 year old males before military service - the incidence doubled in the 80's, declining in the 90's. In Noise and man '93. Noise as a public health problem. Vallet M., ed. Arcueil: INRETS 2: 25-28  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Borchgrevink H.M., Tambs K., Hoffman H.J. (2001). The Nord-Trondelag Norway audiometric survey 1996-98: Unscreened adult high-frequency thresholds, normative thresholds and noise-related socio-acusis. In Henderson D., Prasher D., Kopke R., Salvi R., Hamernik R., eds. Noise Induced Hearing Loss: Basic mechanisms, prevention and control. Noise Research Network Publ., London, pp377-385.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Clark W.W., Bohl C.D. (1996) Hearing levels of US industrial workers employed in low-noise environments. In Scientific basis of noise-induced hearing loss. Axelssoon A., Borchgrevink H.M., Hamernik R.P., Hellstrom P.A., Henderson D., Salvi R.J., eds. Thieme, New York, pp 397-414  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Dalton D.S., Cruickshanks K.J., Wiley T.L., Klein B.E., Klein R., Tweed T.S. (2001). Association of leisure-time noise exposure and hearing loss. Audiology 40(1):1-9.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Davis A.C. (1989) The prevalence of hearing impairment and reported hearing disability among adults in Great Britain. Int. J. Epidemiol. 18(4): 911-917.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Davis A.C. (1997) Epidemiology of hearing disorders. In Scott Brown's Otolaryngology. Kerr A.G., ed. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Fearn R.W., Hanson D.R. (1984) Hearing damage in young people using headphones to listen to pop music. J. Sound Vib. 96: 147-149  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Fleischer G., Hoffmann E., Lang R., Muller R. (1999). Documentation of the effects of child cap pistols. HNO 47(6):535-540.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Gates G.A., Schmid P., Kujawa S.G., Nam B., D'Agostino R. (2000). Longitudinal threshold changes in older men with audiometric notches. Hear Res 141(1-2):220-228.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Gates G.A., Schmid P., Kujawa S.G., Nam B., D'Agostino R. (2001). The effects of aging on noise-damaged ears. In Henderson D., Prasher D., Kopke R., Salvi R., Hamernik R., eds. Noise Induced Hearing Loss: Basic mechanisms, prevention and control. Noise Research Network Publ., London, pp513-522.  Back to cited text no. 16    
17.Hall A.J. and Lutman M.E. (1999). Methods for early identification of noise-induced hearing loss. Audiology 38(5):277-280.  Back to cited text no. 17    
18.HellstrOm P.A. (1991) The effects on hearing from portable cassette players - a follow-up study. J. Sound Vib. 151: 461-469.  Back to cited text no. 18    
19.HellstrOm P.A., Axelsson A., Costa O. (1998). Temporary threshold shift induced by music. Scand Audiol Suppl 48:87-94.  Back to cited text no. 19    
20.Hoffmann E. (1997). Horfahigkeit und Horschaden junger Erwachsener unter Beriicksichtigung der Larmbelastung. Heidelberg, Median.  Back to cited text no. 20    
21.Hotz M.A., Probst R., Harris F.P., Hauser R. (1993). Monitoring the effects of noise exposure using transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 113:478-482.  Back to cited text no. 21    
22.Inoue Y., Inoue T., Tanaka Y. (1996) Dip-shaped hearing loss of Bekesy audiogram in high school students. [Japanese]. Nippon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho [Journal of the Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Society of Japan] 99(3): 432-444  Back to cited text no. 22    
23.Ishii E.K., Talbott E.O. (1998) Race/ethnicity differences in the prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss in a group of metal fabricating workers. J Occup Environ Med 40(8):661-666.  Back to cited text no. 23    
24.Ising H., Babisch W., Hanel J., Kruppa B., Pilgramm M. (1994) Empirical studies of music listening habits of adolescents. Optimizing sound threshold limits for cassette players and discotheques. [German]. HNO 43(4): 244-249  Back to cited text no. 24    
25.Ising H., Babisch W. (1998). Unterzuchung der Horfahigkeit und Musikhorgewohnheiten von Jugendlichen sowie der Akzeptanz pegelbegrenzten Kassettenabspielgerats Z.f. Audiologi Suppl 1:195-201  Back to cited text no. 25    
26.ISO 389. (1994) Acoustics - Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.  Back to cited text no. 26    
27.Jekel J.F. (1996) Rainbow reviews. VII: Recent publications of the National Center for Health Statistics. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 49(7): 765-768  Back to cited text no. 27    
28.Joachims Z., Netzer A., Ising H. (1993). Oral magnesium suppplementation as prophylaxix for noise-induced hearing loss: results of a blind field study. Schriftenr Ver Wasser Boden Lufthyg 88:503-516.  Back to cited text no. 28    
29.Kahari K.R., Axelsson A., Hellstrom P.A., Zachau G. (2001a). Hearing assessment of classical orchestral musicians. Scand Audiol 30(1):13-23.  Back to cited text no. 29    
30.Kahari K.R., Axelsson A., Hellstrom P.A., Zachau G. (2001b). Hearing development in classical orchestral musicians. A follow-up study. Scand Audiol 30(3):141­149.  Back to cited text no. 30    
31.Katz A.E., Gerstman H.L., Sanderson R.G., Buchanan R. (1982) Stereo headphones and hearing loss. N. Engl. J. Med. 307: 1460-1461  Back to cited text no. 31    
32.Kiukaanniemi H., Lopponen H., Sorri M. (1992). Noise­induced low- and high-frequency hearing losses in Finnish conscripts. Mil Med 157:480-482.  Back to cited text no. 32    
33.Korpert K. (1992). Hearing thresholds of young workers measured in the period from 1976 to 1991. Swiss Acoust Soc 181-184.  Back to cited text no. 33    
34.Kruppa B., Dieroft H.G., Ising H. (1995). Sensorineurale Gehorschaden bei Schulanfangern. HNO 43:31-34.  Back to cited text no. 34    
35.Lee D.J., Gomez-Marin O., Lee H.M. (1996) Prevalence of childhood hearing loss. The Hispanic Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey II. Am. J. Epidemiol. 144(5): 442-449  Back to cited text no. 35    
36.Lutman M.E., Davis A.C. (1994). The distribution of hearing threshold levels in the general population aged 18­30 years. Audiology 33(6):327-350.  Back to cited text no. 36    
37.Maassen M., Babisch W., Bachmann K.D., Ising H., Lehnert G., Plath P., Plinkert P., Rebentisch E., Schuschke G., Spreng M., Stange G., Struwe V., Zenner H.P. (2001). Ear damage caused by leisure noise. Noise & Health 4(13):236-248.  Back to cited text no. 37    
38.Marshall L., Lapsley Miller J.A., Heller L.M. (2001). Distortion product otoacoustic emissions as a screening tool for noise-induced hearing loss. In Henderson D., Prasher D., Kopke R., Salvi R., Hamernik R., eds. Noise Induced Hearing Loss: Basic mechanisms, prevention and control. Noise Research Network Publ., London, pp453­470.  Back to cited text no. 38    
39.McBride D.I., Williams S. (2001). Audiometric notch as a sign of noise induced hearing loss. Occup Environ Med 58(1):46-51.  Back to cited text no. 39    
40.Mercier V., Wursch P., Hohmann B. (1998). Gehorfahrdung Jugendlicher durch uberlauten Musikkonsum. Z Larmbekampfung 45:17-21.  Back to cited text no. 40    
41.Merluzzi F., Arpini A., Camerino D., Barducci M., Marazzi P. (1997) Auditory thresholds in young Italians 18-19 years of age. [Italian]. Medicina del Lavoro 88(3): 183-195  Back to cited text no. 41    
42.Meyer-Bisch C. (1996) Epidemiological evaluation of hearing damage related to strongly amplified music (personal cassette players, discotheques, rock concerts) - high-definition audiometric survey on 1364 subjects. Audiology 35(3): 121-142  Back to cited text no. 42    
43.Metternich F.U., Brusis T. (1999). Acute hearing loss and tinnitus caused by amplified recreational music. Laryngorhinootologie 78(11):614-619.  Back to cited text no. 43    
44.Miller J.M., Dolan D.F., Raphael Y., Altschuler R.A. (1998). Interactive effects of aging with noise induced hearing loss. Scand Audiol Suppl, 48:53-61.  Back to cited text no. 44    
45.Mills J.H., Dubno J.R., Boettcher F.A. (1998). Interaction of noise-induced hearing loss and presbyacusis. Scand Audiol Suppl, 48:117-122.  Back to cited text no. 45    
46.Mills J.H., Schulte B.A., Boettcher F.A., Dubno J.R. (1998). A comparison of age-related hearing loss and noise-induced hearing loss. In Henderson D., Prasher D., Kopke R., Salvi R., Hamernik R., eds. Noise Induced Hearing Loss: Basic mechanisms, prevention and control. Noise Research Network Publ., London, pp497-511.  Back to cited text no. 46    
47.Mori T. (1985) Effects of recorded music on young workers in a shipyard. Arch. Occup. Health. 56: 91-97  Back to cited text no. 47    
48.Mostafapour S.P., Lahargoue K, Gates G.A. (1998) Noise­induced hearing loss in young adults: The role of personal listening devices and other sources of leisure noise. Laryngoscope 108(12): 1832-1839.  Back to cited text no. 48    
49.Murray N.M., LePage E.L. (1993) Age dependence of otoacoustic emissions and apparent rates of ageing of the inner ear in an Australian population. Aust. J. Audiol. 15: 59-70  Back to cited text no. 49    
50.Nassar G. (2001). The human temporary threshold shift after exposure to 60 minutes' noise in an aerobic class. Br J Audiol 35(1):99-101.  Back to cited text no. 50    
51.NATO (1986). Smoorenburg G.F., Forrest M., Borchgrevink H.M., Brinkmann H., Dancer A., Forshaw S., Pfander F., Patterson J., Phillips Y., Price R. Effects of impulse noise. Report from NATO Panel VIII Reserach Study Group No 6, AC243. NATO, BrUssel (41 p+57p app.).  Back to cited text no. 51    
52.Niskar A.S., Kiesak S.M., Holmes A.E., Esteban E., Rubin C., Brody D.J. (2001). Estimated prevalence of noise­induced hearing threshold shifts am0ng children 6 to 19 years of age: he Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994, United States. Pediatrics 108(1):40-43.  Back to cited text no. 52    
53.Nondahl D.M., Cruickshanks K.J., Wiley T.L., Klein R., Klein B.E., Tweed T.S. (2000). Recreational firearm use and hearing loss. Arch Fam Med 9(4):352-357.  Back to cited text no. 53    
54.Passchier-Vermeer W., Vos H., Steenbekkers J.H.M. (1998) Popmusic through headphones and hearing loss. TNO-Report 98.036, TNO Prevention and Health, TNO­PG, Leiden.  Back to cited text no. 54    
55.Pelausa E.O., Abel S.M., Simard J., Dempsey I. (1995) Prevention of noise-induced hearing loss in the Canadian military. J. Otolaryngol. 24(5): 271-280  Back to cited text no. 55    
56.Porter N.D., Flindell I.H., Berry B.F. (1998). Health effect­based noise assessment methods: a review and feasibility study. National Physical Laboratory NPL Report CMAM 16, Teddington.  Back to cited text no. 56    
57.Ritter D.C., Perkins J.L. (2001). Noise-induced hearing loss among US Air Force cryptolinguists. Aviat Space Environ Med 72(6):546-552.  Back to cited text no. 57    
58.Rosen S., Plester D., El-Mofty A., Rosen H.V. (1964) High frequency audiometry in presbycusis. Arch Otolaryngol 79: 18-32  Back to cited text no. 58    
59.Rosenhall U., Axelsson A., Svedberg A. (1993) Hearing in 18 year old men - is high frequency hearing loss more common today than 17 years ago? In Noise and man '93. Noise as a public health problem. Vallet M., ed. Arcueil: INRETS 2: 119-122  Back to cited text no. 59    
60.Smith P.A., Lutman M.E. (1992) Consequences of the change to standards for airconduction hearing levels. A cautionary note. Br J Audiol 26(1):59-61.  Back to cited text no. 60    
61.Stewart M., Konkle D.F., Simpson T.H. (2001). The effect of recreational gunfire noise in workers exposed to occupational noise. Ear Nose Throat J 80(1):32-34, 36, 38-40.  Back to cited text no. 61    
62.Struwe F., Jansen G., Schwarze S., Schwenzer C., Nitsche M. (1996). Untersuchung von Hogewohnheiten und moglichen Gehorrisiken durch Schalleinwirkungen in der Freizeit unter besonderer Berucksichtigung des Walkman­Horens. In Babisch W., Bambach G., Ising H., Kruppa B., Plath P., Rebentisch E., Struwe V., eds. Gehorgefardung durch laute Musik und Freizeitsldrm. WaBuLu Hefte Umweltbundesamt, Berlin 5:144-154.  Back to cited text no. 62    
63.Tin L.L., Lim O.P. (2000). A study on the effects of discotheque noise on the hearing of young patrons. Asia Pac J Public Health 12(1):37-40.  Back to cited text no. 63    
64.Turunen-Rise I., Flottorp G., Tvete O. (1991). A study of the possibility of aquiring noise-induced hearing loss by the use of personal cassette players (Walkman). In Borchgrevink H.M., ed. Effects of noise and blasts. Scand Audiol Suppl 34:133-144.  Back to cited text no. 64    
65.Ward W.D. (1993) Current exposure standards; interaction of exposures; susceptibility and vulnerability. In Noise and man '93. Noise as a public health problem. Vallet M., ed. Arcueil: INRETS 3:152-160.  Back to cited text no. 65    
66.Ward W.D. (1990) Presbyacusis and NIHL, current DRC and the validity of EEH, noise susceptibility and new psychoacoustic methods. In Noise as a public health problem. New advances in noise research, Part 1. Berglund B., Lindvall T., eds. Swedish Council for Building Research, Stockholm, pp 167-177  Back to cited text no. 66    
67.Wilson D.H., Walsh P.G., Sanchez L., Davis A.C., Taylor A.W., Tucker G., Meagher I. (1999) The epidemiology of hearing impairment in an Australian adult population. Int. J. Epidemiol. 28: 247-252  Back to cited text no. 67    
68.Wong T.W., Vanhasselt C.A., Tang L.S., Yiu P.C. (1990) The use of personal cassette players among youths and its effects on hearing. Public Health 104: 327-330.  Back to cited text no. 68    

Top
Correspondence Address:
H M Borchgrevink
Executive Director, Medicine & Health, The Research Council of Norway (RCN) Boks 2700 St.-Hanshaugen, N-0131 Oslo
Norway
Login to access the Email id


PMID: 12631433

Get Permissions




This article has been cited by
1 Digital music exposure reliably induces temporary threshold shift in normal-hearing human subjects
Le Prell, C.G. and Dell, S. and Hensley, B. and Hall III, J.W. and Campbel, K.C.M. and Antonelli, P.J. and Green, G.E. and Miller, J.M. and Guire, K.
Ear and Hearing. 2012; 33(6): e44-e58
[Pubmed]
2 Hearing threshold, loss, noise levels and workerćs profiles of an open cast chromite mines in Odisha, India
Kerketta, S. and Gartia, R. and Bagh, S.
Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2012; 19(4): 64-72
[Pubmed]
3 Audiological diagnosis of hearing loss in individuals exposed to industrial noise
Dragutinovic, N. and Eminovic, F. and Nikic, R.
HealthMED. 2012; 6(1): 201-207
[Pubmed]
4 The effect of a hearing conservation program on adolescents′ attitudes towards noise
Dell, S.M. and Holmes, A.E.
Noise and Health. 2012; 14(56): 39-44
[Pubmed]
5 Assessment of noise levels generated by music shops in an urban city in Nigeria
Ebare, M.N. and Omuemu, V.O. and Isah, E.C.
Public Health. 2011; 125(9): 660-664
[Pubmed]
6 Use of historical data and a novel metric in the evaluation of the effectiveness of hearing conservation program components
Heyer, N. and Morata, T.C. and Pinkerton, L.E. and Brueck, S.E. and Stancescu, D. and Panaccio, M.P. and Kim, H. and Sinclair, J.S. and Waters, M.A. and Estill, C.F. and Franks, J.R.
Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2011; 68(7): 510-517
[Pubmed]
7 Surveillance for work-related audiological disease in the UK: 1998-2006
Money, A. and Carder, M. and Turner, S. and Hussey, L. and Agius, R.
Occupational Medicine. 2011; 61(4): 226-233
[Pubmed]
8 Hearing loss prevention for carpenters: Part 1 - Using health communication and health promotion models to develop training that works
Stephenson, C.M. and Stephenson, M.R.
Noise and Health. 2011; 13(51): 113-121
[Pubmed]
9 Evidence of hearing loss in a ćnormally-hearingć college-student population
Le Prell, C.G., Hensley, B.N., Campbell, K.C.M., Hall, J.W., Guire, K.
International Journal of Audiology. 2011; 50(suppl 1): s21-s31
[Pubmed]
10 Risk behavior of lead-exposed workers and hearing impairment
Galal, S., El-Samra, G.H., Mazhar, M., El-Kholy, F., Hegazy, A.
International Journal of Collaborative Research on Internal Medicine and Public Health. 2011; 3(2): 132-142
[Pubmed]
11 Potential hazard of hearing damage to students in undergraduate popular music courses
Barlow, C.
Medical Problems of Performing Artists. 2010; 25(4): 175-182
[Pubmed]
12 Assessment of hearing standard threshold shift based on audiometric findings in steel company workers
Attarchi, M.S., Sadeghi, Z., Dehghan, F., Sohrabi, M.M., Mohammadi, S.
Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. 2010; 12(6): 644-649
[Pubmed]
13 Hearing damage as a consequence of firefightersć professional exposure to noise | [Oštećenje sluha vatrogasaca kao posljedica profesionalne izloženosti buci]
Lalić, H., Ferhatović, M., Jurjević, D., Čulinović, M.
Acta Medica Croatica. 2009; 63(2): 195-199
[Pubmed]
14 What is the influence of background noise and exercise on the listening levels of iPod users?
Hodgetts, W., Szarko, R., Rieger, J.
International Journal of Audiology. 2009; 48(12): 825-832
[Pubmed]
15 The epidemiologic study on hearing standard threshold shift using audiometric data and noise level among workers of Isfehan metal industry
Pourabdiyan, S., Ghotbi, M., Yousefi, H.A., Habibi, E., Zare, M.
Koomesh. 2009; 10(4): 253-259-+38
[Pubmed]
16 Workplace noise exposure after modernisation of an aluminium processing complex
Doko-Jelinić, J., Lukić, J., Udovičić, R., Žuškin, E., Nola, I.A., Zajec, Z.
Arhiv za Higijenu Rada i Toksikologiju. 2009; 60(3): 343-348
[Pubmed]
17 The prevalence and correlates of hearing loss in drivers in Isfahan, Iran
Janghorbani, M., Sheikhi, A., Pourabdian, S.
Archives of Iranian Medicine. 2009; 12(2): 128-134
[Pubmed]
18 Interventions to prevent occupational noise induced hearing loss
Verbeek, J.H., Kateman, E., Morata, T.C., Dreschler, W., Sorgdrager, B.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009; 3(art )
[Pubmed]
19 Socioeconomic inequalities in hearing loss: The HUNT study
Helvik, A.-S., Krokstad, S., Tambs, K.
American Journal of Public Health. 2009; 99(8): 1376-1378
[Pubmed]
20 Hearing damage as a consequence of firefightersć professional exposure to noise [Oštećenje sluha vatrogasaca kao posljedica profesionalne izloĹľenosti buci]
Lalić, H. and Ferhatović, M. and Jurjević, D. and Čulinović, M.
Acta Medica Croatica. 2009; 63(2): 195-199
[Pubmed]
21 Occupational noise exposure and hearing loss among pulse processing workers
Patel, V.S., Ingle, S.T.
Environmentalist. 2008; 28(4): 358-365
[Pubmed]
22 Noise-induced hearing loss in school-age children: What do we know?
Hidecker, M.J.C.
Seminars in Hearing. 2008; 29(1): 19-28
[Pubmed]
23 The environmental health of children: Priorities in Europe
Zuurbier, M., Lundqvist, C., Salines, G., Stansfeld, S., Hanke, W., Babisch, W., Bistrup, M.L., (...), Moshammer, H.
International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health. 2007; 20(3): 291-308
[Pubmed]
24 Environmental health of European children: Priorities recommended by the PINCHE network [La santé environnementale des enfants en Europe: Priorités proposées par le réseau PINCHE]
Zuurbier, M. and Salines, G. and Moshammer, H. and Stansfeld, S. and Lundqvist, C. and Hanke, W. and Van Den Hazel, P. and Bistrup, M.L. and Babisch, W.
Environnement, Risques et Sante. 2007; 6(1): 43-56
[Pubmed]
25 Noise and hearing loss: A review
Daniel, E.
Journal of School Health. 2007; 77(5): 225-231
[Pubmed]
26 Occupational noise exposure and sensorineural hearing loss among workers of a steel rolling mill
Ologe, F.E., Akande, T.M., Olajide, T.G.
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2006; 263(7): 618-621
[Pubmed]
27 Psychological well-being of adults with acquired hearing impairment
Helvik, A.-S., Jacobsen, G., Hallberg, L.R.-M.
Disability and Rehabilitation. 2006; 28(9): 535-545
[Pubmed]
28 Plasma antibodies to heat shock protein 60 and heat shock protein 70 are associated with increased risk of electrocardiograph abnormalities in automobile workers exposed to noise
Yuan, J., Yang, M., Yao, H., Zheng, J., Yang, Q., Chen, S., Wei, Q., (...), Wu, T.
Cell Stress and Chaperones. 2005; 10(2): 126-135
[Pubmed]



 

Top