Home Email this page Print this page Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size
Noise & Health  
 CURRENT ISSUE    PAST ISSUES    AHEAD OF PRINT    SEARCH   GET E-ALERTS    
 
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


 
   Abstract
   Introduction
   Study population...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed14200    
    Printed518    
    Emailed12    
    PDF Downloaded448    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 44    

Recommend this journal

 


 
ARTICLES Table of Contents   
Year : 2004  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 24  |  Page : 43-49
Road traffic noise and annoyance-an increasing environmental health problem

1 Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Stockholm County Council; Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Sweden
2 Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Stockholm County Council, Sweden

Click here for correspondence address and email
 
  Abstract 

Traffic noise, which is steadily increasing, is considered to be an important environmental health problem. The aim of this study was to estimate the degree of annoyance and sleep disturbance related to road traffic noise in residential settings in an urban community. The study is based on a questionnaire on environmentally related health effects distributed to a stratified random sample of 1000 individuals, 19-80 years old, in a municipality with heavy traffic in the county of Stockholm. The response rate was 76%. The individual noise exposure was estimated using evaluated noise dispersion models and local noise assessments. Frequent annoyance was reported by 13% of subjects exposed to Leq 24 hr >50 dBA compared to 2% among those exposed to <50 dBA, resulting in a difference of 11% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 7%, 15%). Sometimes or frequently occurring sleep disturbance was reported by 23% at Leq 24 hr >50 dBA and by 13% at levels <50 dBA, a difference of 11% (95% CI 4%, 18%). A positive exposure- response relation was indicated for annoyance as well as for sleep disturbances when classifying the individuals into four different exposure categories (< 45, 46≠ 50, 51-55 and >55 dBA Leq 24 hr). There was some habituation to noise for problems related to sleep but not for annoyance. The prevalence of both annoyance and sleep problems was higher when bedroom windows were facing streets. People living in apartments had more sleep problems compared to people living in detached or semi-detached houses. In conclusion traffic noise exposure, even at low levels, was associated with annoyance and sleep disturbance. Access to a quiet side seemed to be a major protective factor for noise related problems.

Keywords: Road traffic noise, health effects, annoyance, sleep disturbances

How to cite this article:
Bluhm G, Nordling E, Berglind N. Road traffic noise and annoyance-an increasing environmental health problem. Noise Health 2004;6:43-9

How to cite this URL:
Bluhm G, Nordling E, Berglind N. Road traffic noise and annoyance-an increasing environmental health problem. Noise Health [serial online] 2004 [cited 2018 Feb 19];6:43-9. Available from: http://www.noiseandhealth.org/text.asp?2004/6/24/43/31656

  Introduction Top


Traffic noise is an increasing problem in the modern society and it is the dominating source of noise in the urban environment (Ouis, 1999). In the European Union 40% of the inhabitants are exposed to equivalent noise levels exceeding 55 dBA in daytime and more than 30% in night≠time (The National Board of Health and Welfare et al., 2001). In Sweden, almost two million people are exposed to equivalent noise levels exceeding 55 dBA and almost one million are annoyed by noise outside or near their homes once a week or more often (Swedish Environmental Protection Agency and Statistics Sweden, 2000).

Common noise related problems are interference with communication and sleep disturbance (Griefahn et al., 2000). Decreased quality of sleep is considered to be a major health outcome of environmental noise (Berglund and Lindvall, 1995). Noise exposure can also cause other non≠auditory effects such as annoyance, changes of behavior and deterioration in performance. Long- term effects of road traffic noise on psychosocial health and wellbeing are also described (Ohrstrom et al., 1998). Studies have shown that people living near streets with busy traffic or airports close their windows, spend less time in their gardens, and have less visitors than people living in more quiet areas (Griefahn, 2000).

Primary physiological effects of noise exposure are vegetative reactions such as increases in blood pressure, heart rate and finger pulse amplitude, cardiac arrhythmia and changes in respiration and body movements (Berglund and Lindvall, 1995). Secondary effects are reduction in perceived sleep quality, increased fatigue, decreased mood or wellbeing and deterioration in performance. Cardiovascular effects of traffic noise such as hypertension and ischaemic heart disease have also been described but epidemiological evidence is still limited in this respect (Babisch, 2000). In a recent study a relationship between aircraft noise exposure and hypertension has been reported (Rosenlund et al., 2001).

The present study was initiated due to increasing amount of complaints on traffic noise from the inhabitants in Sollentuna, a municipality outside Stockholm with heavy traffic from roads as well as from the railway. Our objective was to analyse annoyance and sleep disturbances in relation to road traffic noise in residential settings in the municipality and to investigate at what exposure levels these effects appeared. We also wanted to investigate the influence of factors such as room orientation and satisfaction with residence on the reaction to noise exposure.


  Study population and methods Top


In April 1997 a postal questionnaire used in a Stockholm County survey of environmental factors and health was distributed to 1000 individuals 19-80 years of age living in Sollentuna municipality north of Stockholm City.

One sample was drawn from buffer zones of 100 meters on each side of main roads, highways and the railway (n=500). Another sample was drawn from the remaining part of the municipality (n=500). As the present study was focused on road traffic noise, subjects living within 100 meters from the railway (n=135) were not included in the analyses. The sampling was performed by Statistics Sweden by combining The National Population Register, containing background information for the study population, with the Central Register for Real Estate Data containing geographical co≠ordinates for the individuals residences. After up to three written reminders a total of 657 individuals answered the questionnaire, giving a response rate of 76%.

The individuals were classified into four exposure categories with equivalent road traffic noise levels, Leq 24 hr <45 dBA, 46-50 dBA, 51-55 dBA and >55 dBA, according to the location of their residences. For the six-lane highway that intersects the municipality, a Nordic prediction model for road traffic noise was available from the Swedish National Road Administration (Swedish Environmental Protection Agency et al., 1999). The local Environment and Health Protection Administration had applied the same prediction model for other major roads in the area. For residences not covered by any of the models, the noise exposure was determined manually by an environmental health officer with knowledge of the local noise situation.

The questionnaire included 87 questions mainly focusing on prevalence of allergic diseases and environmental risk factors for health of regional importance such as air pollution and noise. General background factors such as sex and age were obtained from the National Population Register, while the questionnaire provided information on education level, employment status, living conditions, residential time, smoking habits, general annoyance and sleep disturbances due to traffic noise. To estimate annoyance and sleep disturbances questions with a scale of four were used: "Yes, often (every week)", "Yes, sometimes", "No, never" and "Not relevant/ no noise". Sleep disturbances were classified as awakenings and/or difficulties falling asleep. Annoyance and sleep problems were defined as frequent when occurring every week.

To compare prevalence of annoyance and sleep disturbances due to road traffic noise at different exposure levels, crude and standardized differences in proportions were calculated. The standardized differences in proportions were calculated using the distribution of exposure in the general population as estimated from the survey as weights for standardization. The standardised differences in proportions are interpreted as the difference between the groups if exposure was identically distributed in the groups. Proportions and differences of proportions are presented along with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). A chi-square test for linear trend was used to test whether or not there was a linear trend in the proportions of annoyance and sleep disturbances over noise exposure categories.


  Results Top


Annoyance

Frequent annoyance was reported by 12.8% among individuals exposed to equivalent road traffic noise levels above 50 dBA and by 2.1%for those exposed to lower levels, resulting in a difference of 10.7% (95% CI 6.9%, 14.5%). Corresponding figures for sometimes or frequently occurring annoyance were 38.9% and 13.3% with a difference of 25.6% (95% CI 19.1%, 32.1%). Among those exposed to equivalent noise levels above 55 dBA sometimes or frequently occurring annoyance was reported by 50.0%. When analyzing the four exposure categories (<45 dBA, 46-50 dBA, 51-55dBA and >55 dB), a positive trend was found for both "sometimes or frequent" and "frequent" annoyance [Figure - 1].

There were no differences regarding reported annoyance due to sex, age, residence time or education [Table - 1]. A difference was indicated between single-family houses and apartments, but this was reduced after standardization. Annoyance was reported among 39.6% and 23.3% in the groups with bedroom window facing the street and bedroom window facing the garden, respectively. The difference remained significant after standardization. Annoyance from road traffic noise at 24 hr average exposure levels >50 dBA was reported by 28.0% among those who were satisfied with their residences and by 42.3% among those who were less satisfied. Also this difference was significant after standardization.

Sleep disturbances

Frequently occurring sleep disturbances were reported by 13 persons (3.9%) among those with 24 hr sound pressure levels >50 dBA, and by 2 persons (1.2%) among those exposed to lower levels, giving a difference of 2.7% (95% CI: 0.02%, 5.4%). Corresponding figures for sometimes or frequently occurring sleep disturbances were 23.6% and 12.8% respectively giving a difference of 10.8% (95% CI 3.9%, 17.6%). There was a positive exposure-response trend both for "sometimes or frequent" and "frequent" sleep disturbance [Figure - 2].

Regarding problems with sleep there were no differences regarding sex, age and education [Table - 2]. People living in single family houses reported sleep disturbances in 16.5% compared to 25.4% among people living in apartments, with a standardised difference of -13.0% (95% CI -21.8%, -4.1%). The prevalence of sleep problems was also significantly lower in the group with residential time >10 years.

In general more people were disturbed among those with their bedroom windows facing the street. In total 27.0% reported sleep disturbances in this group compared to 15.9% among those with their bedroom windows facing a quiet side [Table - 2].


  Discussion Top


Annoyance

In the present study there was a clear relationship between the proportion of individuals reporting annoyance due to road traffic noise and modelled exposure levels. This is in accordance with previous studies (Abel 1990; Stansfeld et al., 1993)

A considerable number of the respondents reported annoyance already in the interval 50-55 dBA. The crude classification of annoyance used in the present study compared to the scale of five that was described by Stansfeld et al. (1993) could, at least partly, explain this. In that study also the equivalent sound level was calculated from 6 am to 10 PM, while 24 hour periods were used in the present study. 24 hr noise levels of road traffic are usually 1 to 3 dBA lower than daytime noise levels (Rylander et al., 1986). A possible misclassification due to underestimation of true noise levels can also not be excluded.

The orientation of the bedroom window was of major importance for the over all prevalence of annoyance due to road traffic noise. In total annoyance was more commonly reported among those with bedroom windows facing the street, but there was a similar trend with increasing annoyance at higher exposure levels in both groups. This is in agreement with previous studies (Ohrstrom, 1993a).

Some studies have indicated that elderly people are more affected by noise (Berglund and Lindvall, 1995). Gender differences have also been discussed (Passchier-Vermeer and Passchier, 2000). However in the present study there were only minor divergences regarding reported annoyance and sleep disturbances related to sex. There were also no obvious age≠dependent differences.

It has been suggested that people might get used to noise with longer residential time (Griefahn et al., 2000) A reason for a decrease in number of complaints might be that annoyed people move elsewhere. In other studies an increase in annoyance with longer residential time has instead been described (Abel, 1990). In the present study no difference related to time of residence was observed.

It has previously been reported that people living in single-family houses experience annoyance in a higher degree than those living in apartments do (Abel, 1990). In the present study no such difference was observed when taking into account the distribution of exposure.

Satisfaction with residence was related to a low frequency of reported annoyance. This is in accordance with previous findings (Ohrstr6m, 1993a). Naturally noise exposure could be a reason for dissatisfaction. On the other hand an increased vulnerability for stress inducing factors could trigger annoyance due to noise exposure. It has been proposed that with a belief that noise has an influence on health it is likely that exposure to noise can cause dissatisfaction and annoyance (Job, 1996).

Sleep disturbances

Few people reported frequent sleep disturbances but several were occasionally disturbed. Laboratory studies have indicated that self≠ reported noise related problems with sleep could give an underestimation of the physiological effect (Ohrstrom, 1993b). Thus, even if many people only experience sleep disturbances occasionally it may indicate more serious influence on sleep quality.

A limitation of this study is that we only had information about equivalent noise levels. Laboratory studies have indicated that maximum noise levels and the number of events exceeding a certain sound pressure level, are better associated with sleep disturbance (Ohrstrom and Rylander, 1990; Ohrstrom, 1991). However, in this study equivalent noise levels seemed to be well correlated with sleep disturbances and there was an obvious exposure-response relationship.

Noise effects are reported to be dependent on mediating factors like room orientation and window opening habits. Thus it is strongly indicated that such factors should be considered in the analysis of reactions to noise (Ohrstrom, 1993a). If the bedroom window faces the street, the time needed to fall asleep increases (Ouis, 1999). More serious physiological effects have also been described with window orientation towards busy streets (Babisch, 2000). In the present study there was also a higher frequency of self-reported sleep disturbance among those with bedroom window facing the street.

In the future sleep disturbances are expected to increase since traffic density will grow, more during the night than during the day (Griefahn et al., 2000). The orientation of the bedroom is therefore important to take into account when planning for residential areas.

That women can be more sensitive to noise during sleep than men has been suggested previously (Berglund and Lindvall, 1995). However in this study no such difference was observed.

As for annoyance, studies have shown that full habituation do not occur for sleep disturbances (Griefahn et al., 2000). In their investigation a time dependent decrease but no extinction of noise- induced reactions was observed for people living in noisy areas. However in the present study there was a marked decrease for sleep disturbances but not for annoyance with longer residential time.

An unexpected finding was that people living in single family houses had a much lower frequency of sleep problems, a difference that increased after standardization for modelled exposure levels. Possible explanations for this might be differences in coping strategies, or differences in building construction that may affect the actual levels inside the homes.


  Conclusion Top


In this study many people reported disturbances from road traffic noise already at lower noise levels. There was an obvious exposure-response relation both for annoyance and problems with sleep. Bedroom window orientation seemed to be a factor of main importance for occurrence of disturbances related to traffic noise exposure.[20]

 
  References Top

1.Abel. S.M. (1990) The extra-auditory effects of noise and annoyance: an overview of research. J. Otolaryngol. Suppl.1:1-13.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Babisch W. (2000) Traffic noise and cardiovascular disease: epidemiological review and synthesis. Noise & Health. 8: 9-32.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Berglund B. Lindvall T. (1995) Community Noise. Archives of the Center for Sensory Research. Stockholm University and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Griefahn B. (2000) Noise effects not only the ears. But can damage to health be objectively evaluated? [in German] MMW Fortschritte der Medizin. 6; 142(14): 26-29  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Griefahn B., Scheumer-Kohrs A., Scheumer R., Moehler U., Mehnert P. (2000) Physiological, subjective and behavioural responses during sleep to noise from rail and road traffic. Noise & Health 3; 9: 59-71  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Job R.F.S. (1996) The influence of subjective reactions to noise on health effects of the noise. Environ. Intern. 22 (1): 93-104.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.The National Board of Health and Welfare, Institute of Environmental medicine, Karolinska institute Stockholm, Sweden, Department of Environmental Health, Stockholm County Council. (2001) Swedish National Environment≠Health Report 2001, Stockholm.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Ouis D. (1999) Exposure to nocturnal road traffic noise: Sleep disturbance and its after effects. Noise & Health 4: 11-36.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Passchier-Vermeer W., Passchier W F. (2000) Noise exposure and public health. Environ. Health Perspect. 108(1): 123-131.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Rosenlund M., Berglind N., Pershagen G., Jarup L., Bluhm G. (2001) Increased prevalence of hypertension in a population exposed to aircraft noise. Occup. Environ. Med. 58: 769-773  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Rylander R., Bjorkman M., Ahrlin U., Arntzen E., Solberg S. (1986) Dose-response relationship for traffic noise and annoyance. Arch. Environ. Health. 41(1):7-10.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Statistics Sweden. (2000) Naturmiljon i siffror [in Swedish] Stockholm.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Stansfeld S. A., Sharp D. S., Gallacher J., Babisch W. (1993) Road traffic noise, noise sensitivity and psychological disorder, Psychological Medicine 23: 977≠ 985.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Swedish National Road Administration, Nordiska ministerradet. (1999) Vdgtrafikbuller. Nordisk berdkningsmodell, reviderad 1996 (Road traffic noise. Nordic prediction model, revised 1996). Report 4653 [in Swedish] Naturvardsverkets forlag, Stockholm.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Ohrstrom E., Rylander R. (1990) Sleep disturbance by road traffic noise- a laboratory study on number of noise events. J. Sound Vibr. 143:93-101.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Ohrstrom E. (1991) Psycho-social effects of traffic noise exposure. J. Sound Vibr. 151:513-517.  Back to cited text no. 16    
17.Ohrstrom E. (1993a) Long-term effects in terms of psycho-social wellbeing, annoyance and sleep disturbance in areas exposed to high levels of road traffic noise. In M Vallet (Ed.) Noise & Man 1993.- Noise as a Public Health  Back to cited text no. 17    
18.Problem. Proceedings of the 6th International Congress. Institut National de Recherche sur les Transports et leur Securite Nice, France 1993. Vol 2: 209-212.  Back to cited text no. 18    
19.Ohrstrom E. (1993b) Research on noise and sleep since 1988: Present state. Noise as a Public Health Problem: Sixth international congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem. 1993;3:331-339.  Back to cited text no. 19    
20.Ohrstrom E., Agge A., Bjorkman M. (1998) Sleep disturbances before and after reduction in road traffic noise. In Carter N., Job R.S.F. (Eds.) Noise effects 98. Proceedings of the 7th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, Sydney 1998. Vol 2: 451-454.  Back to cited text no. 20    

Top
Correspondence Address:
G Bluhm
Department of Environmental Health, Norrbacka, 3rd floor, Karolinska Hospital, SE-171 79 Stockholm
Sweden
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 15703140

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure - 1], [Figure - 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table - 1], [Table - 2]

This article has been cited by
1 The effects of road traffic noise on mental performance
Alimohammadi, I. and Soltani, R. and Sandrock, S. and Azkhosh, M. and Gohari, M.R.
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering. 2013; 10(1)
[Pubmed]
2 Road traffic noise and annoyance: A quantification of the effect of quiet side exposure at dwellings
de Kluizenaar, Y. and Janssen, S.A. and Vos, H. and Salomons, E.M. and Zhou, H. and van den Berg, F.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2013; 10(6): 22582270
[Pubmed]
3 Metric properties and normative data for brief noise and electromagnetic field sensitivity scales
Nordin, S. and Palmquist, E. and Claeson, A.-S.
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 2013; 41(3): 293-301
[Pubmed]
4 Linking traffic noise, noise annoyance and life satisfaction: A case study
Urban, J. and M√°ca, V.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2013; 10(5): 1895-1915
[Pubmed]
5 The effects of meteorological parameters in ambient noise modelling studies in Delhi
Singh, D. and Prakash, A. and Srivastava, A.K. and Kumar, K. and Jain, V.K.
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2013; 185(2): 1873-1882
[Pubmed]
6 Preliminary information on noise pollution in commercial banks of Balasore, India
Goswami, S. and Swain, B.K.
Journal of Environmental Biology. 2012; 33(6): 999-1002
[Pubmed]
7 Annoyance and other reaction measures to changes in noise exposure - A review
Laszlo, H.E. and McRobie, E.S. and Stansfeld, S.A. and Hansell, A.L.
Science of the Total Environment. 2012; 435-436: 551-562
[Pubmed]
8 Associations between nighttime traffic noise and sleep: The Finnish public sector study
Halonen, J.I. and Vahtera, J. and Stansfeld, S. and Yli-Tuomi, T. and Salo, P. and Pentti, J. and Kivimäki, M. and Lanki, T.
Environmental Health Perspectives. 2012; 120(10): 1391-1396
[Pubmed]
9 Assessment of noise pollution in Thoothukudi City
Gayathri, K. and Amutha Jaisheeba, A. and Sornaraj, R.
International Journal of PharmTech Research. 2012; 4(3): 1345-1350
[Pubmed]
10 Assessment and analysis of noise levels in and around Ib river coalfield, Orissa, India
Mohapatra, H. and Goswami, S.
Journal of Environmental Biology. 2012; 33(3): 649-655
[Pubmed]
11 Annoyance of traffic noise on roads and rail
Cik, M. and Fallast, K. and Fellendorf, M.
Transportation Research Record. 2012; (2270): 16-22
[Pubmed]
12 Involuntary and persistent environmental noise influences health and hearing in Beirut, Lebanon
Fooladi, M.M.
Journal of Environmental and Public Health. 2012; 2012(235618)
[Pubmed]
13 Study of association between noise levels and stress in traffic policemen of Bengaluru city
Venkatappa, K.G. and Vinutha Shankar, M.S.
Biomedical Research. 2012; 23(1): 135-138
[Pubmed]
14 Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practices of traffic policemen regarding the auditory effects of noise
Venkatappa, K.G. and Vinutha Shankar, M.S. and Annamalai, N.
Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 2012; 56(1): 69-73
[Pubmed]
15 A Street categorization method to study urban noise: The valladolid (Spain) study
Carmona Del Río, F.J. and Gómez Escobar, V. and Trujillo Carmona, J. and Vílchez-Gómez, R. and Méndez Sierra, J.A. and Rey Gozalo, G. and Barrigón Morillas, J.M.
Environmental Engineering Science. 2011; 28(11): 811-817
[Pubmed]
16 Evaluation of protective role of benzodiazepine in noise stress induced activation of hypothalamo-pituitary adrenal axis in albino rats
Rizvi, S.M.I.H. and Rizvi, S.R. and Sheikh, A.A. and Ul Haque, S.
Medical Forum Monthly. 2011; 22(11): 46-50
[Pubmed]
17 Road traffic noise: Self-reported noise annoyance versus GIS modelled road traffic noise exposure
Birk, M. and Ivina, O. and Von Klot, S. and Babisch, W. and Heinrich, J.
Journal of Environmental Monitoring. 2011; 13(11): 3237-3245
[Pubmed]
18 Noise level of hospital environment [Hastane ortami{dotless
Vehid, S. and Erginöz, E. and Yurtseven, E. and Çetin, E. and Köksal, S. and Kaypmaz, A.
TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin. 2011; 10(4): 409-414
[Pubmed]
19 A methodology to study noise annoyance and to perform action plans follow up using as input an existing survey and noise map: Application to the city of MŠlaga (Spain)
MartŪn, M.A., Tarrero, A.I., MacHimbarrena, M., GonzŠlez, J., Garibay, V.G.D.
Applied Acoustics. 2011; 72(8): 495-504
[Pubmed]
20 Traffic noise pollution in Karachi, Pakistan
Khan, M.W., Memon, M.A., Khan, M.N., Khan, M.M.
Journal of the Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences. 2010; 9(3): 114-120
[Pubmed]
21 The urban acoustic environment - A survey for road traffic noise
Popescu, D.I. and Tuns, R.E. and Moholea, I.F.
Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences. 2010; 6(1): 285-292
[Pubmed]
22 Design of athensś tram and urban bus depots surrounding areas based on noise levels monitoring
Ntoulas, N. and Nektarios, P.A.
Acta Horticulturae. 2010; 881: 343-346
[Pubmed]
23 Extent of traffic induced noise in the noise sensitive institutions of Chittagong city, Bangladesh
Chowdhury, R.B., Dey, R., Alam, M.S., Chakraborty, P.
Noise and Vibration Worldwide. 2010; 41(1): 28-36
[Pubmed]
24 Impact of road traffic noise annoyance on health-related quality of life: Results from a population-based study
Dratva, J., Zemp, E., Dietrich, D.F., Bridevaux, P.-O., Rochat, T., Schindler, C., Gerbase, M.W.
Quality of Life Research. 2010; 19(1): 37-46
[Pubmed]
25 Work zone noise levels at Aarti steel plant, Orissa and its attenuation in far field
Kerketta, S., Dash, P.K., Narayan, L.T.P.
Journal of Environmental Biology. 2009; 30((5 SUPPL)): 903-908
[Pubmed]
26 Disturbed sleep and musculoskeletal pain in the bed partner of patients with obstructive sleep apnea
Smith, A.K.A., Togeiro, S.M.G., Tufik, S., Roizenblatt, S.
Sleep Medicine. 2009; 10(8): 904-912
[Pubmed]
27 Annoyance from environmental noise across the lifespan
Van Gerven, P.W.M., Vos, H., Van Boxtel, M.P.J., Janssen, S.A., Miedema, H.M.E.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2009; 126(1): 187-194
[Pubmed]
28 Green space, soundscape and urban sustainability: An interdisciplinary, empirical study
Irvine, K.N., Devine-Wright, P., Payne, S.R., Fuller, R.A., Painter, B., Gaston, K.J.
Local Environment. 2009; 14(2): 155-172
[Pubmed]
29 Influence of truck traffic on acoustic pollution in Kaunas districts crossed by highways
Graěulevičiene, R., Bendokiene, I.
Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management. 2009; 17(4): 198-204
[Pubmed]
30 Reduction of road traffic noise and mental health: An intervention study
Stansfeld, S., Haines, M., Berry, B., Burr, M.
Noise and Health. 2009; 11(44): 169-175
[Pubmed]
31 A framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic risks
Briggs, D.J.
Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source. 2008; 7(art no 61)
[Pubmed]
32 Sleep deprivation: A clinical perspective
Murphy, K., Delanty, N.
Sleep and Biological Rhythms. 2007; 5(1): 2-14
[Pubmed]
33 Noise mapping in Romania within the framework of EU directive 2002/49/EC
Popescu, D.I.
Archives of Acoustics. 2007; 32(2): 1-2
[Pubmed]
34 Trait anxiety and modeled exposure as determinants of self-reported annoyance to sound, air pollution and other environmental factors in the home
Persson, R., Björk, J., Ardö, J., Albin, M., Jakobsson, K.
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2007; 81(2): 179-191
[Pubmed]
35 What do patterns of noise in a teaching hospital and nursing home suggest?
Bharathan, T., Glodan, D., Ramesh, A., Vardhini, B., Baccash, E., Kiselev, P., Goldenberg, G.
Noise and Health. 2007; 9(35): 31-34
[Pubmed]
36 Associations between noise sensitivity and sleep, subjectively evaluated sleep quality, annoyance, and performance after exposure to nocturnal traffic noise
Marks, A., Griefahn, B.
Noise and Health. 2007; 9(34): 1-7
[Pubmed]
37 Personal noise ranking of road traffic: Subjective estimation versus physiological parameters under laboratory conditions
Raggam, R.B., Cik, M., Höldrich, R.R., Fallast, K., Gallasch, E., Fend, M., Lackner, A., Marth, E.
International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. 2007; 210(2): 97-105
[Pubmed]
38 Noise pollution: A modern plague
Goines, L., Hagler, L.
Southern Medical Journal. 2007; 100(3): 287-294
[Pubmed]
39 Road traffic noise and hypertension
Bluhm, G.L., Berglind, N., Nordling, E., Rosenlund, M.
Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2007; 64(2): 122-126
[Pubmed]
40 Snoring noise pollution - The need for objective quantification of annoyance, regulatory guidelines and mandatory therapy for snoring
Caffier, P.P., Berl, J.C., Muggli, A., Reinhardt, A., Jakob, A., Möser, M., Fietze, I., (...), Hölzl, M.
Physiological Measurement. 2007; 28(1): 25-40
[Pubmed]
41 Train driversś sleep quality and quantity during extended relay operations
Jay, S.M., Dawson, D., Lamond, N.
Chronobiology International. 2006; 23(6): 1241-1252
[Pubmed]
42 An estimation of annoyance due to various public modes of transport in Delhi
Prakash, A., Joute, K., Jain, V.K.
Noise and Health. 2006; 8(32): 101-107
[Pubmed]
43 Self-reported hearing quality of traffic policemen: A questionnaire-based study
Tripathi, S.R., Tiwari, R.R.
Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2006; 10(2): 82-84
[Pubmed]
44 Road traffic noise in southern Sweden and its relation to annoyance, disturbance of daily activities and health
Björk, J., Ardö, J., Stroh, E., Lövkvist, H., Östergren, P.-O., Albin, M.
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health. 2006; 32(5): 392-401
[Pubmed]



 

Top