1">

  Home Email this page Print this page Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size
Noise & Health  
 CURRENT ISSUE    PAST ISSUES    AHEAD OF PRINT    SEARCH   GET E-ALERTS    
 
 Next article
 Previous article
Table of Contents

Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Citation Manager
Access Statistics
Reader Comments
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5112    
    Printed257    
    Emailed3    
    PDF Downloaded222    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal

 

 ARTICLES
Year : 2005  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 26  |  Page : 59--70

"Could we all be a little more quiet, please?" A behavioural-science commentary on research for a quieter Europe in 20201


University of Groningen, Netherlands

Correspondence Address:
C Vlek
Department of Psychology, Grote Kruisstraat, 2/I, 9712 TS Groningen
Netherlands
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 16053607

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

European noise research and policy-making ~ overall not so effective thus far ~ is considered from a behavioral science perspective. First, an overview is given of a recent strategy paper by the EU's CALM network 1 , focused on perception-related and emission-related research. After a summary of noise effects on human well-being, environmental noise problems are discussed as socio-technical problems where the social part is just as important as the technical part. The behavioral and social components of noise emission, transmission, exposure and effect are explicated. Environmental stress is considered as a double-sided phenomenon involving subjects' threat appraisal and their coping appraisal, each comprising specific underlying variables. From the wider perspective explained, several comments are given on the research strategy CALM is proposing. It is argued that: increasing motorization undermines noise abatement; dose-response relationships reflect only part of the problem; more attention is needed for the causative behavior of noisy actors; technical noise-reduction measures are necessary but insufficient; and that noise as a daily stressor should be treated in the context of people's overall quality of life. Specific suggestions are listed for EU noise research and policy-making. One conclusion is that more effective and visionary European noise policies may well be started tomorrow and need not depend on 15 years more research as envisaged in the CALM strategy paper.






[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*


        
Print this article     Email this article