Home Email this page Print this page Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size
Noise & Health  
 CURRENT ISSUE    PAST ISSUES    AHEAD OF PRINT    SEARCH   GET E-ALERTS    
 
 Next article
 Previous article
Table of Contents

Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Citation Manager
Access Statistics
Reader Comments
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed6008    
    Printed101    
    Emailed3    
    PDF Downloaded29    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 7    

Recommend this journal

 

 ARTICLE
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 67  |  Page : 398--405

Does tinnitus "fill in" the silent gaps?


1 Department of Communicative Disorders and Science, Center for Hearing and Deafness, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
2 Department of Communicative Disorders and Science, Center for Hearing and Deafness, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY; Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA

Correspondence Address:
Richard Salvi
Center for Hearing and Deafness, 137 Cary Hall, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: Research supported in part by grants from NIH (R01DC009091-05; R01DC009219-05) and ONR (N000141210731), Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.121232

Rights and Permissions

In the basic sciences, many researchers now use gap pre-pulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex (GPIAS) to determine if an animal has tinnitus after exposure to an ototoxic drug or intense noise. Tinnitus is assumed to be present if the silent gap in an ongoing narrow band noise (NBN) fails to suppress the startle reflex response evoked by an intense noise burst. The lack of gap pre-pulse inhibition presumably occurs because tinnitus fills in the silent intervals in the background noise. To test the perceptual aspects of this hypothesis, we asked hearing impaired subjects with tinnitus if they could perceive 50 ms silent intervals presented in a NBN, which was located above, below or at the subject's tinnitus pitch. The same tests were performed on normal hearing subjects without tinnitus. All subjects, with and without tinnitus, could detect the 50 ms gaps. Thus, using the stimulus parameters similar to those employed in animal and human GPIAS studies, we found that the tinnitus percept does not fill in the silent interval in a perceptual gap detection task; however, these finding do not rule out the possibility that tinnitus interferes with pre-attentive filtering of sensory stimuli in the GPIAS sensorimotor gating paradigm.






[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*


        
Print this article     Email this article