Home Email this page Print this page Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size
Noise & Health  
 CURRENT ISSUE    PAST ISSUES    AHEAD OF PRINT    SEARCH   GET E-ALERTS    
 
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


 
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Material and Methods
  Results
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Figures
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed631    
    Printed6    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded3    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
  Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 20  |  Issue : 97  |  Page : 223-231
Apoptosis in the cochlear nucleus and inferior colliculus upon repeated noise exposure

Department of Otolaryngology, Unfallkrankenhaus, Charité Medical School, Berlin, Germany

Click here for correspondence address and email
Date of Web Publication9-Dec-2019
 
  Abstract 


The time course of apoptosis and the corresponding neuronal loss was previously shown in central auditory pathway of mice after a single noise exposure. However, repeated acoustic exposure is a major risk factor for noise-induced hearing loss. The present study investigated apoptosis by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay after a second noise trauma in the ventral and dorsal cochlear nucleus and central nucleus of the inferior colliculus. Mice [Naval Medical Research Institute (NMRI) strain] were noise exposed [115 dB sound pressure level, 5–20 kHz, 3 h) at day 0. A double group received the identical noise exposure a second time at day 7 post-exposure and apoptosis was either analyzed immediately (7-day group-double) or 1 week later (14-day group-double). Corresponding single exposure groups were chosen as controls. No differences in TUNEL were seen between 7-day or 14-day single and double-trauma groups. Interestingly, independent of the second noise exposure, apoptosis increased significantly in the 14-day groups compared to the 7-day groups in all investigated areas. It seems that the first noise trauma has a long-lasting effect on apoptotic mechanisms in the central auditory pathway that were not largely influenced by a second trauma. Homeostatic mechanisms induced by the first trauma might protect the central auditory pathway from further damage during a specific time slot. These results might help to understand the underlying mechanisms of different psychoacoustic phenomena in noise-induced hearing loss.

Keywords: Noise-induced apoptosis, noise-induced hearing loss, repeated noise exposure, TUNEL-staining

How to cite this article:
Frohlich F, Gröschel M, Strübing I, Ernst A, Basta D. Apoptosis in the cochlear nucleus and inferior colliculus upon repeated noise exposure. Noise Health 2018;20:223-31

How to cite this URL:
Frohlich F, Gröschel M, Strübing I, Ernst A, Basta D. Apoptosis in the cochlear nucleus and inferior colliculus upon repeated noise exposure. Noise Health [serial online] 2018 [cited 2020 Feb 17];20:223-31. Available from: http://www.noiseandhealth.org/text.asp?2018/20/97/223/272479



  Introduction Top


Noise is well known as an important environmental factor for hearing disorders. Repeated noise exposure is a major risk factor for noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL), the most common consequence of noise overexposure.[1]

Previous studies have shown the influence of acoustic overexposure on the middle (e.g., deluxation of ossicles) and inner ear (e.g., hair cell loss).[2],[3],[4],[5],[6] This has been investigated for decades and is still the subject of research. Change in the central auditory pathway because of acoustic overstimulation is another important topic that has been addressed during the last few years. Deafferentation because of acoustic overexposure as well as after cochlea ablation was shown in the cochlear nucleus (CN).[7],[8],[9] NIHL leads to axon degeneration in the CN and superior olivary complex.[10],[11] Besides the effect of deafferentation, acoustic overstimulation has a direct impact on central mechanisms and leads to an intense metabolic activity that can result in the formation of free radicals and reactive oxygen species or lipid peroxidation.[12],[13],[14],[15] Reactive oxygen species and mitochondrial dysfunction are major causes of cell pathologies that accelerate cell death mechanisms such as apoptosis.[16] As a consequence, apoptosis is supposed to be directly stimulated by noise and hypothesized as one underlying pathophysiological mechanism for noise-induced neuronal loss in the central auditory pathway.[11],[17],[18],[19],[20] Noise-induced apoptosis was recently described in the auditory pathway.[19],[20],[21] In humans, for example, factory workers, nightclub visitors, and musicians, repeated acoustic exposure to traumatizing noise is the most common situation.[1] Little is known about central changes after multiple noise exposure. Besides NIHL, a phenomenon called “toughening” and an upregulation of activity-dependent calcium-binding protein in the spiral ganglion and CN were found after repeated noise exposure.[22] Also, an increase in Ca2+-dependent activity in key structures of the central auditory pathway after a second noise trauma was described.[23] The effects on hearing thresholds depend on the noise exposure paradigm and threshold shift amplitudes differ between single and repeated noise trauma in most of the studies.[21],[22],[23]

Our working group recently described the time course of apoptosis in the ventral CN (VCN), dorsal CN (DCN), central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICC), medial geniculate body, and primary auditory cortex (AI) after a single noise exposure.[19],[20] Apoptosis after repeated noise trauma was already seen in the medial geniculate body and auditory cortex.[21],[24] The present study aimed at investigating the incidence of cell death after a second noise exposure in the VCN, DCN, and ICC. This might help to understand hearing pathologies in NIHL such as tinnitus or changed speech intelligibility.[25],[26],[27]


  Material and Methods Top


Eighteen young adult (30–40 days of age) female normal hearing mice [Naval Medical Research Institute (NMRI) strain] with fully developed auditory systems were used in the present study. Recent studies showed sex-specific results in mice after NIHL.[28],[29] To keep variance of the data low, only female mice were used in the present experiments. The experimental protocol was approved by the government commission for animal studies (LaGeSo, Berlin, Germany; PI: Dr. Dietmar Basta, approval number: G0416/10). Experiments were carried out in accordance with the European Union (EU) Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. All efforts were made to minimize pain and discomfort in the animals.

Noise exposure

The noise exposure paradigm has been described in recent publications of our group.[18],[19],[20] Briefly, animals were exposed to a broadband flat spectrum noise (5–20 kHz) for 3 hours at 115 dB sound pressure level under anesthesia (6 mg/kg xylazine and 60 mg/kg ketamine) in a soundproof chamber (80 cm × 80 cm × 80 cm, minimal attenuation 60 dB). An amplifier (Tangent AMP-50; Eltax, Aulum, Denmark) and a DVD player were connected to loudspeakers (HTC 11.19; Visaton, Haan, Germany) placed above the animals’ heads. A sound level meter (Voltcraft 329; Conrad Electronic, Wernberg-Köblitz, Germany) was placed next to the animal’s ear to calibrate sound pressure level. A heating pad (Thermolux CM 15W; Acculux, Murrhardt, Germany) was placed under the animals to keep the body temperature constant at 37°C during video camera-controlled anesthesia.

Schedule of treatment

Different groups of animals were investigated at various point of time after single or double noise exposure [Figure 1] analogous to earlier investigations.[24],[23] Eighteen animals of the experimental groups were noise exposed at day 0 and randomly assigned to the experimental groups. The single exposure group was exposed to the initial trauma only and either investigated at day 7 post-exposure (“7-day group-single”; n = 4 animals) or at day 14 post-exposure (“14-day group-single”; n = 5 animals). The remaining nine animals were exposed to noise for a second time 1 week after the first noise trauma (“double trauma group”). Five of these mice were investigated immediately after the second exposure (“7-day group-double”), and the other four animals were left in their cages for 1 week and analyzed on day 14 after the first exposure (“14-day group-double”).
Figure 1: Schematic illustration of the experimental groups. All mice were noise exposed at day 0 and either analyzed on day 7 (7-day groups) or on day 14 (14-day groups) post-exposure. Double groups were noise exposed for second time at day 7 and either investigated immediately after this trauma (7-day group-double) or 1 week later (14-day group-double) and compared to the corresponding single group (7-day group-single, 14-day group-single).

Click here to view


TUNEL staining

Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labeling (TUNEL) was performed according to earlier investigations.[20],[24] Briefly, on the day of investigation, animals were perfused via the left heart chamber with a fixative solution (4% paraformaldehyde). The skull was carefully opened to remove the brain. After embedding in paraffin, 10-μm-thick slices in the frontal plane were cut using a rotation microtome (Euromex Präzisions Minot Rotations Mikrotom MT.5505; Euromex, Arnhem, The Netherlands). The frontal plane and the sagittal axis were defined according to the mouse brain atlas of Paxinos and Franklin.[30] Comparable sections of the respective investigated structure from each animal were used for the analysis. The slices were stained by using the TUNEL method (In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit POD; Roche, Mannheim, Germany) to visualize cell death mechanisms.[31] After removing the paraffin (2× Rotihistol [Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany] for 10 min) and rehydrating in a descending ethanol series (90% and 70% each for 5 min) and distilled water (5 min), a pretreatment with 5% proteinase K (20.5 µg/mL in 10 mM trishydroxymethylaminomethane, pH 7.5, Roche; 100 µL per slice for 10 min) was performed.[32] DNA strand breaks were provoked via deoxyribonuclease I recombinant (100 U/mL; Roche) used as a positive control as proposed by the manufacturer (Roche). A 3% H2O2 solution (dissolved in methanol) was applied for 5 minutes to block endogenous nucleases and avoid false-positive results. Each slice was incubated for 60 minutes with 50 μL TUNEL reaction mixture [diluted 1:2 with phosphate buffered saline (PBS)] at 37°C in a humidified chamber. To obtain a light microscopic analysis, each slice was incubated for 30 minutes with 50-μL converter POD, with diaminobenzidine as substrate (50 μL per slice for 10 min). After washing in PBS and distilled water, dehydration in an ascending alcohol series (70% ethanol, 90% ethanol, and 100% isopropanol, each for 1 min) was performed. Slices were stored in Rotihistol until mounting with Roti Histokitt (Carl Roth).

TUNEL cell counting and statistical analysis

The stained slices were microscopically magnified (250×, Axiovert 25C; Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany) and colored photomicrographs were taken using a digital camera (Canon Eos 1000D, Tochigi, Japan). Pictures were standardized (“autocontrast” function, Adobe Photoshop CS3 Extended, Version 10.0, 2007, USA) and the number of TUNEL-positive cells[33] was counted in particular grids within VCN (0.22 mm × 0.17 mm), the fusiform layer of DCN (0.16 mm × 0.1 mm), and the ICC (0.45 mm × 0.33 mm) [Figure 2]. The brain areas were defined in accordance with the mouse brain atlas of Paxinos and Franklin.[30] The grid was manually placed in the center of the structure after randomization of the experimental groups. Equivalent regions of interest were investigated in earlier studies for determination of noise-induced neuronal cell loss as well as noise-induced apoptosis after a single noise trauma in VCN, DCN, and ICC.[18],[19] To avoid double counting the same cell in different layers, every second slice was added to the histological analyses.[24] The cell counting was performed manually. To reduce technical and methodical errors to a minimum, the slides were counted after randomization and the counter was “blind” to the structure and the group.
Figure 2: TUNEL-positive cells in a VCN grid. A VCN grid (0.22 mm × 0.17 mm) captured at 250× magnification. A single TUNEL-positive cell is seen in the grid (7-day group-single). TUNEL = terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labeling; VCN = ventral and dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Click here to view


The statistical procedure was chosen accordingly to earlier investigations about TUNEL in CN and ICC after a single noise exposure.[19] The mean of TUNEL-positive cells (sum of TUNEL-positive cells divided by the number of grids) and standard error (SE) were calculated for all groups and structures. Data from the double noise exposure groups was tested for significant differences against the corresponding single noise exposure groups. Data from the 14-day groups was tested for significant differences against the corresponding 7-day groups.

The data distribution was statistically tested by Kolmogoroff–Smirnoff test. Normally distributed data was tested for significant differences by using the t test, otherwise the Mann–Whitney U test (u-test) was applied. The significance levels were set to P < 0.05 for all tests. The Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc test was used to counteract the problem of multiple statistical comparisons and minimize the false discovery rate.[34] SPSS software (SPSS Statistics, Version 20; IBM, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical calculations. Results with statistical significance at the level of P < 0.05 were marked with an asterisk. Results without statistical significance were marked with “n.s.” (not significant).


  Results Top


Ventral cochlear nucleus

In VCN, 54 TUNEL-positive cells were counted in 34 slices analyzed in 7-day group-single (45 TUNEL-positive cells in 40 slices in 7-day group-double) and 93 TUNEL-positive cells were found in 29 slices in 14-day group-single (102 TUNEL-positive cells in 28 slices in 14-day group-double). No statistically significant differences in the mean of TUNEL-positive cells per grid were found within the 7-day groups (VCN: 7-day single = 1.59 ± 0.30 SE; 7-day double = 1.13 ± 0.23; PVCN-7-day = 0.156 [u-test]) nor within the 14-day groups (VCN: 14-day single = 3.21 ± 0.61 SE; 14-day double = 3.64 ± 0.48; P14-day = 0.579 [t-test]). The mean of TUNEL-positive cells was statistically significant elevated in the 14-day group compared to 7-day group (Psingle = 0.021 [u-test] and Pdouble = 0.000 [u-test], respectively) [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Ventral cochlear nucleus. The mean of TUNEL-positive cells and standard error in the ventral cochlear nucleus 1 (7-day groups) or 2 weeks (14-day groups) after the initial noise exposure in the single (light gray) and double exposure groups (dark gray). No differences in the incidence of TUNEL-positive cells were found between single and double-trauma group neither in the 7-day nor 14-day group (n.s.). TUNEL was increased in the 14-day groups compared to 7-day groups (asterisk). n.s. = not significant; TUNEL = terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labeling.

Click here to view


Dorsal cochlear nucleus

In DCN, 20 slices (15 TUNEL-positive cells in total) of 7-day group-single (21 slices [14 TUNEL-positive cells] of 7-day group-double) and 34 slices (80 TUNEL-positive cells) of 14-day group-single (32 slices [75 TUNEL-positive cells] of 14-day group-double) were included in the statistical analysis. No statistically significant differences in the mean of TUNEL-positive cells per grid were found within the 7-day group (DCN: 7-day single = 0.75 ± 0.28 SE; 7-day double = 0.67 ± 0.20; PDCN-7-day = 0.883 [u-test]) nor within the 14-day group (DCN: 14-day single = 2.35 ± 0.35 SE; 14-day double = 2.34 ± 0.35; PDCN-14-day = 0.953 [u-test]). The mean of TUNEL-positive cells was statistically significant elevated in the 14-day group compared to the 7-day group (Psingle = 0.001 [u-test] and Pdouble = 0.000 [u-test], respectively) [Figure 4].
Figure 4: Dorsal cochlear nucleus. The mean of TUNEL-positive cells and standard error in the dorsal cochlear nucleus 1 (7-day groups) or 2 weeks (14-day groups) after the initial noise exposure in the single (light gray) and double exposure groups (dark gray). Compared to 7-day groups, TUNEL was increased in the 14-day groups (asterisk). No differences in the incidence of TUNEL-positive cells were found between single and double-trauma group neither in the 7-day nor 14-day group (n.s.). n.s. = not significant; TUNEL = terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labeling.

Click here to view


Central nucleus of the inferior colliculus

In ICC, 29 slices were analyzed in 7-day group-single (63 TUNEL-positive cells) (30 slices in 7-day group-double [57 TUNEL-positive cells]) and 38 slices in 14-day group-single (197 TUNEL-positive cells) (28 slices in 14-day group-double [146 TUNEL-positive cells]). No statistically significant differences in TUNEL-positive cells per grid were found within the 7-day group (ICC: 7-day single = 2.17 ± 0.42 SE; 7-day double = 1.90 ± 0.27; PICC-7-day = 0.883 [u-test]) nor within the 14-day group (ICC: 14-day single = 5.18 ± 0.66 SE; 14-day double = 5.21 ± 0.88; PICC-14-day = 0.978 [t-test]). The increase in TUNEL in the 14-day group was statistically significant compared to the 7-day group within the single exposure group (Psingle = 0.000 [t-test]) and double exposure group (Pdouble = 0.005 [u-test]) [Figure 5].
Figure 5: Inferior colliculus. Mean of TUNEL-positive cells and standard error in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus 1 (7-day groups) or 2 weeks (14-day groups) after the initial noise exposure in the single (light gray) and double exposure groups (dark gray). Compared to 7-day groups, TUNEL was increased in the 14-day groups (asterisk). No differences in the incidence of TUNEL-positive cells were found between single and double-trauma group neither in the 7-day nor 14-day group (n.s.). n.s. = not significant; TUNEL = terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labeling.

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The present study investigated the incidence of cell death mechanisms in the VCN, DCN, and ICC immediately and 1 week after a second noise exposure at traumatizing level. Compared to a corresponding single noise exposure, the influence of the second noise trauma on cell death mechanisms was very limited in the investigated basal structures of the central auditory pathway. Surprisingly, an increase in TUNEL-positive cells was seen in the 14-day groups independent of the number of sound exposures in all investigated areas. This might be a long-term effect upon the first noise exposure rather than a consequence of the second noise trauma.

Influence of a second noise trauma on the incidence of apoptosis in VCN, DCN, and ICC

Our group showed a direct impact of a single noise exposure on apoptosis in the VCN, DCN, and ICC and described the time course of cell death over 1 week post-exposure.[19] In the present study, a second noise trauma was performed 1 week after the first trauma [Figure 1], when the peak of cell death after the first noise exposure had already been exceeded in VCN, DCN, and ICC.[19] It was shown that the incidence of apoptosis immediately increased after the first noise exposure in VCN and ICC.[19] The present second noise exposure could not alter cell death mechanisms in VCN, DCN, and ICC in the same intensity. No increase in TUNEL was seen immediately after the second noise exposure (7-day group-double) compared to the corresponding single group (7-day group-single) [Figure 3],[Figure 4],[Figure 5]. It was shown that the incidence of apoptosis on day 7 after a single noise exposure was either decreased to pretraumatic level (VCN) or slightly upregulated (ICC and DCN) compared to unexposed controls.[19] Therefore, the small number of TUNEL-positive cells in the present 7-day groups is less surprising, especially in the small analyzed area of the DCN. In the present investigation, on day 7 after repeated noise exposure (14-day group-double) [Figure 1], the incidence of TUNEL was increased compared to 7-day group-double. This increase seems to be mainly triggered by factors other than the second noise exposure as it was also seen in the corresponding single groups [Figure 3],[Figure 4],[Figure 5].

With regard to the present results, it should be considered for different reasons that a second traumatizing noise exposure might not be processed in the basal structures of the central auditory pathway in the same manner as the first noise trauma. First of all, the previous studies have shown that the present noise paradigm leads to a permanent threshold shift in NMRI mice with a loss of hair cells in the cochlear frequency range of noise stimulation that extends over time.[3],[23],[35],[36],[37],[38] Due to the identical noise trauma characteristic of the first and second noise exposure, it seems plausible that the frequency range of the second noise application has its largest impact on the tonotopic region in the organ of corti that shows destroyed hair cells due to the first noise exposure. Concerning hair cell function as mechanoreceptor and afferent neuron of the VIII cranial nerve, the second noise trauma might not be transduced to the central auditory pathway in the same intensity. Second, a massive reduction in cell densities had been shown 1 week after a single noise exposure in an earlier study (neuronal loss of 39% in DCN, 30% in VCN, and 31% in ICC, respectively), exactly the moment in time when the second noise exposure was performed in the present study.[18] Besides deafferentation due to a noise-damaged cochlea, neuronal loss is hypothesized as a direct consequence of noise.[18] Third, noise mainly affects acoustic-sensitive neurons but the CN integrates also the nonauditory inputs.[39] As a consequence after noise damage, the CN might change in responsiveness to nonauditory stimuli.[40] The compensatory stronger nonauditory input to the CN and the ICC could lead to a weaker sensitivity to a second auditory stimulation. The interaction of several of these effects might protect the central auditory pathway from further damage and contribute to explain the present findings in TUNEL in the double group compared to the single group. Auditory brainstem recordings from earlier investigations performed in the present 14-day groups are shown in [Figure 6]. The additional shift in hearing thresholds was dramatically smaller after a second noise exposure (compared to the first one) and supports the hypothesis of a weaker responsiveness to a second noise exposure.[23] Furthermore, calcium was statistically significantly elevated upon a second noise trauma in VCN, DCN, and ICC.[23] Its role as a mediator in the generation of necrosis and apoptosis was recently described but calcium is also dose dependent highly involved in neuroprotective mechanisms and might have a protective function in the present study.[23],[41],[42],[43],[44],[45],[46] Calcium might also modulate neuronal nitric oxide synthase and calcium-binding protein calretinin, which increased after single and multiple noise trauma in the CN.[22] Nitric oxide is discussed to play a role in cytotoxicity, cell death, and hearing disorders but can be cell protective depending on its dose.[22],[47] The changes on a molecular level might have a protective role during the second noise exposure in the present study. It might hold true that homeostatic mechanisms induced by the first trauma help to protect the CN and ICC from further damage, at least during a specific timeslot. These long-term effects might contribute to the present increase in TUNEL in the 14-day group independent of the number of exposures.
Figure 6: ABR measurements. ABR threshold shifts at different frequencies of the present 14-day groups (dark gray) and the present single groups (light gray). A threshold shift was seen in the 14-day group-double compared to the corresponding single group in all measured frequencies (dark gray) and statistically significant at 8 kHz (P = 0.045), 12 kHz (P = 0.013), and 20 kHz (P = 0.04). No big changes in ABR thresholds were seen in the 14-day group-single compared to the 7-day group-single (light gray). Either the recovery at 4 kHz (P = 0.923), 8 kHz (P = 0.665), and 12 kHz (P = 0.235) or the worsening at 16 kHz (P = 0.855) and 20 kHz (P = 0.904) had statistical significance. Data from earlier investigations of our group.[23] ABR = auditory brainstem recording.

Click here to view


Long-term effects of the initial noise exposure on apoptosis in VCN, DCN, and ICC

It was earlier hypothesized that noise-induced apoptosis and cell loss seem to terminate 1 week after a single noise trauma in the VCN, whereas it was still observed in DCN and ICC.[18],[19] However, the incidence of TUNEL was increased in the present study in VCN, DCN, and ICC in the 14-day group, apparently independently of the second noise exposure (no differences between the single and double groups). There are different reasons for the present increase in TUNEL in the VCN, DCN, and ICC 2 weeks post-exposure. Neuronal degeneration in the CN varies with the age of the animals as well as trauma etiology.[9],[48] Therefore, the time course of cell death after cochlea removal might not totally match with the noise-induced deafferentation. Nevertheless, cochlea removal or destruction led to increased TUNEL and a continuing or reflating process of cell death beyond 1-week post-exposure in the basal structures of the auditory system.[48],[49] Consequently, the present increase in TUNEL in the 14-day group might rather represent long-term effects of the first noise trauma than a consequence of noise itself. This might also explain the findings of earlier auditory brainstem recording measurements that did not show big differences in hearing thresholds in the present single groups [Figure 6].[23] These long-term effects might include deafferentation and neuroplasticity due to a noise-damaged organ of corti with cochlea damage and changed mechanotransduction after hair call loss.[35],[37],[50] Deafferentation, reorganization, and neuroplasticity take place around 2 weeks post-lesion and go along with apoptosis.[51],[52] This is provided by lacking plasticity markers within 1 week post-exposure in the VCN but their upregulation between 15 and 30 days post-exposure.[51] Statistically significant degeneration was found 1-week post-exposure and progressed for weeks post-exposure in the CN.[8],[9],[53],[54] The sustained increase of choline acetyltransferase activity in the CN granular region after trauma could be consistent with the formation of new cholinergic synapses or upregulation of existing cholinergic synapses upon granule cells and could have got caught by the present 14-day group.[55],[56],[57] Furthermore, excitatory neurotoxicity in the mammalian central nervous system is largely mediated by excessive release of glutamate that might also contribute to a raising cell death in VCN, DCN, and ICC post-exposure.[58],[57] Axonal sprouting like reactive axonal growth was described to occur from weeks up to months after trauma in the DCN and contributes to the process of reorganization.[54],[59] It was shown that the present noise paradigm led to an increase of spontaneous activity in CN and ICC that reflects a more slowly developing phenomenon and occurs secondarily after induction.[38],[60],[61],[62],[63] The neuronal hyperactivity as compensatory mechanism for lost excitatory network inputs might push apoptosis as seen in the present 14-day group.[38],[64] However, the ICC might profit from inhibitory interneurons that project from the CN to higher structures and possibly have protecting function.[19] This theory is provided by earlier investigations about TUNEL and neuronal activity that was much lower in the ICC than in the CN.[19],[64] Apoptosis in the ICC may be derived, prolonged, and stimulated from its external inputs. The most powerful of these inputs would be the (hyperactive) inputs from the DCN, as these project directly to the contralateral ICC.[64],[65],[66],[67],[68]


  Conclusion Top


The present investigation showed an increase in TUNEL 2 weeks after the initial noise trauma independent of the number of noise exposures. It seems that the first noise trauma has a long-lasting effect on apoptotic mechanisms in the CN and ICC. These results might help to understand the underlying mechanisms of different psychoacoustic phenomena in NIHL such as tinnitus, hyperacusis, or reduced speech perception.

Financial support and sponsorship

The present work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant number GR 3519/3-1). The experimental protocol was approved by the governmental commission for animal studies (LaGeSo; approval number: G0416/10). All experiments were made in accordance to ethical standards and performed at the Department of Otolaryngology, Unfallkrankenhaus, Berlin, Germany.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Ologe FE, Olajide TG, Nwawolo CC, Oyejola BA. Deterioration of noise-induced hearing loss among bottling factory workers. J Laryngol Otol 2008;122:786-94.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Borg E. Loss of hair cells and threshold sensitivity during prolonged noise exposure in normotensive albino rats. Hear Res 1987;30(2-3):119-26.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Hamernik RP, Patterson JH, Turrentine GA, Ahroon WA. The quantitative relation between sensory cell loss and hearing thresholds. Hear Res 1989;38:199-211.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Roberto M, Hamernik RP, Turrentine GA. Damage of the auditory system associated with acute blast trauma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989;140(Supplement):23-34.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Patterson JH Jr., Hamernik RP. Blast overpressure induced structural and functional changes in the auditory system. Toxicology 1997;121:29-40.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Pourbakht A, Yamasoba T. Cochlear damage caused by continuous and intermittent noise exposure. Hear Res 2003;178(1-2):70-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Kane EC. Patterns of degeneration in the caudal cochlear nucleus of the cat after cochlear ablation. Anatomic Rec 1974;179:67-91.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Sekiya T, Canlon B, Viberg A, Matsumoto M, Kojima K, Ono K et al. Selective vulnerability of adult cochlear nucleus neurons to de-afferentation by mechanical compression. Exper Neurol 2009;218:117-23.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Sekiya T, Viberg A, Kojima K, Sakamoto T, Nakagawa T, Ito J, Canlon B. Trauma-specific insults to the cochlear nucleus in the rat. J Neurosci Res 2012;90:1924-31.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Kim J, Morest DK, Bohne BA. Degeneration of axons in the brainstem of the chinchilla after auditory overstimulation. Hear Res 1997;103:169-191.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Aarnisalo AA, Pirvola U, Liang XQ, Miller J, Ylikoski J. Apoptosis in auditory brainstem neurons after a severe noise trauma of the organ of Corti: intracochlear GDNF treatment reduces the number of apoptotic cells. J Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 2000;62:330-4.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Henderson D, Bielefeld EC, Harris KC, Hu BH. The role of oxidative stress in noise-induced hearing loss. Ear Hear 2006;27:1-19.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Maulucci G, Troiani D, Eramo SL, Paciello F, Podda MV, Paludetti G et al. Time evolution of noise induced oxidation in outer hair cells: role of NAD(P)H and plasma membrane fluidity. Biochim Biophys Acta 2014;1840:2192-202.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Yamane H, Nakai Y, Takayama M, Iguchi H, Nakagawa T, Kojima A. Appearance of free radicals in the guinea pig inner ear after noise-induced acoustic trauma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1995;252:504-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Ohlemiller KK, Wright JS, Dugan LL. Early elevation of cochlear reactive oxygen species following noise exposure. Audiol Neuro-otol 1999;4:229-36.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Raimundo N, Song L, Shutt TE, McKay SE, Cotney J, Guan MX et al. Mitochondrial stress engages E2F1 apoptotic signaling to cause deafness. Cell 2012;148:716-26.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Basta D, Tzschentke B, Ernst A. Noise-induced cell death in the mouse medial geniculate body and primary auditory cortex. Neurosci Lett 2005;381(1-2):199-204.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Groschel M, Gotze R, Ernst A, Basta D. Differential impact of temporary and permanent noise-induced hearing loss on neuronal cell density in the mouse central auditory pathway. J Neurotrauma 2010;27:1499-507.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Coordes A, Groschel M, Ernst A, Basta D. Apoptotic cascades in the central auditory pathway after noise exposure. J Neurotrauma 2012;29:1249-54.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Frohlich F, Basta D, Strubing I, Ernst A, Groschel M. Time course of cell death due to acoustic overstimulation in the mouse medial geniculate body and primary auditory cortex. Noise Health 2017;19:133-9.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
21.
Saljo A, Bao F, Jingshan S, Hamberger A, Hansson HA, Haglid KG. Exposure to short-lasting impulse noise causes neuronal c-Jun expression and induction of apoptosis in the adult rat brain. J Neurotrauma 2002;19:985-91.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Alvarado JC, Fuentes-Santamaria V, Gabaldon-Ull MC, Jareno-Flores T, Miller JM, Juiz JM. Noise-induced “toughening” effect in Wistar rats: enhanced auditory brainstem responses are related to calretinin and nitric oxide synthase upregulation. Front Neuroanat 2016;10:19.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Groschel M, Muller S, Gotze R, Ernst A, Basta D. The possible impact of noise-induced Ca2+-dependent activity in the central auditory pathway: a manganese-enhanced MRI study. NeuroImage 2011;57:190-7.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Frohlich F, Ernst A, Strubing I, Basta D, Groschel M. Apoptotic mechanisms after repeated noise trauma in the mouse medial geniculate body and primary auditory cortex. Exp Brain Res 2017; 235:3673-3682.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Roberts LE, Eggermont JJ, Caspary DM, Shore SE, Melcher JR, Kaltenbach JA. Ringing ears: the neuroscience of tinnitus. J Neurosci 2010;30:14972-9.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Marsh JE, Ljung R, Nostl A, Threadgold E, Campbell TA. Failing to get the gist of what’s being said: background noise impairs higher-order cognitive processing. Front Psychol 2015;6:548.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Shore SE, Roberts LE, Langguth B. Maladaptive plasticity in tinnitus − triggers, mechanisms and treatment. Nat Rev Neurol 2016;12:150-60.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Milon B, Mitra S, Song Y, Margulies Z, Casserly R, Drake V et al. The impact of biological sex on the response to noise and otoprotective therapies against acoustic injury in mice. Biol Sex Differ 2018;9:12.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Canlon B, Frisina RD. Sex hormones and hearing: a pioneering area of enquiry. Hear Res 2009; 252(1-2):1-2.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Paxinos G, Franklin KBJ. The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. Vol Bd. 1. 2001. New York: Academic Press.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Gavrieli Y, Sherman Y, Ben-Sasson SA. Identification of programmed cell death in situ via specific labeling of nuclear DNA fragmentation. J Cell Biol 1992;119:493-501.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Negoescu A, Lorimier P, Labat-Moleur F, Drouet C, Robert C, Guillermet C et al. In situ apoptotic cell labeling by the TUNEL method: improvement and evaluation on cell preparations. J Histochem Cytochem 1996;44:959-68.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Kroemer G, Galluzzi L, Vandenabeele P, Abrams J, Alnemri ES, Baehrecke EH et al. Classification of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2009. Cell Death Different 2009;16:3-11.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Ludbrook J. On making multiple comparisons in clinical and experimental pharmacology and physiology. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 1991;18:379-92.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Hu BH, Henderson D, Nicotera TM. Involvement of apoptosis in progression of cochlear lesion following exposure to intense noise. Hear Res 2002;166(1-2):62-71.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Chen G-D., Fechter LD. The relationship between noise-induced hearing loss and hair cell loss in rats. Hear Res 2003;177(1-2):81-90.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Hu BH, Henderson D, Nicotera TM. Extremely rapid induction of outer hair cell apoptosis in the chinchilla cochlea following exposure to impulse noise. Hear Res 2006;211(1-2):16-25.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Groschel M, Ryll J, Gotze R, Ernst A, Basta D. Acute and long-term effects of noise exposure on the neuronal spontaneous activity in cochlear nucleus and inferior colliculus brain slices. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014:909260.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Alibardi L. Mossy fibers in granule cell areas of the rat dorsal cochlear nucleus from intrinsic and extrinsic origin innervate unipolar brush cell glomeruli. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol 2004;36:193-210.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Shore SE, Koehler S, Oldakowski M, Hughes LF, Syed S. Dorsal cochlear nucleus responses to somatosensory stimulation are enhanced after noise-induced hearing loss. Eur J Neurosci 2008;27:155-68.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Johnson EM Jr., Koike T, Franklin J. A “calcium set-point hypothesis" of neuronal dependence on neurotrophic factor. Exp Neurol 1992;115:163-6.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Eimerl S, Schramm M. The quantity of calcium that appears to induce neuronal death. J Neurochem 1994;62:1223-6.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Choi DW. Calcium: still center-stage in hypoxic-ischemic neuronal death. Trends Neurosci 1995;18:58-60.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Grasl-Kraupp B, Ruttkay-Nedecky B, Koudelka H, Bukowska K, Bursch W, Schulte-Hermann R. In situ detection of fragmented DNA (TUNEL assay) fails to discriminate among apoptosis, necrosis, and autolytic cell death: a cautionary note. Hepatology 1995;21:1465-8.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Yu SP, Canzoniero LM, Choi DW. Ion homeostasis and apoptosis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2001;13:405-11.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Canzoniero LM, Babcock DJ, Gottron FJ, Grabb MC, Manzerra P, Snider BJ, Choi DW. Raising intracellular calcium attenuates neuronal apoptosis triggered by staurosporine or oxygen-glucose deprivation in the presence of glutamate receptor blockade. Neurobiology Dis 2004;15:520-8.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Heinrich UR, Helling K. Nitric oxide − a versatile key player in cochlear function and hearing disorders. Nitric Oxide 2012;27:106-16.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Mostafapour SP, Cochran SL, Del Puerto NM, Rubel EW. Patterns of cell death in mouse anteroventral cochlear nucleus neurons after unilateral cochlea removal. J Comparat Neurol 2000;426:561-71.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Karnes HE, Kaiser CL, Durham D. Deafferentation-induced caspase-3 activation and DNA fragmentation in chick cochlear nucleus neurons. Neuroscience 2009;159:804-18.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Hamernik RP, Turrentine G, Roberto M, Salvi R, Henderson D. Anatomical correlates of impulse noise-induced mechanical damage in the cochlea. Hear Res 1984;13:229-47.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Kraus KS, Ding D, Zhou Y, Salvi RJ. Central auditory plasticity after carboplatin-induced unilateral inner ear damage in the chinchilla: up-regulation of GAP-43 in the ventral cochlear nucleus. Hear Res 2009;255(1-2):33-43.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Gil-Loyzaga P, Carricondo F, Bartolome MV, Iglesias MC, Rodriguez F, Poch-Broto J. Cellular and molecular bases of neuroplasticity: brainstem effects after cochlear damage. Acta Oto-laryngol 2010;130:318-25.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Morest DK, Kim J, Potashner SJ, Bohne BA. Long-term degeneration in the cochlear nerve and cochlear nucleus of the adult chinchilla following acoustic overstimulation. Microsc Res Tech 1998;41:205-16.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Kim JJ, Gross J, Morest DK, Potashner SJ. Quantitative study of degeneration and new growth of axons and synaptic endings in the chinchilla cochlear nucleus after acoustic overstimulation. J Neurosci Res 2004;77:829-42.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Jin YM, Godfrey DA, Wang J, Kaltenbach JA. Effects of intense tone exposure on choline acetyltransferase activity in the hamster cochlear nucleus. Hear Res 2006;216-217:168-75.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Godfrey DA, Kaltenbach JA, Chen K, Ilyas O. Choline acetyltransferase activity in the hamster central auditory system and long-term effects of intense tone exposure. J Neurosci Res 2013;91:987-96.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.
Lee AC, Godfrey DA. Cochlear damage affects neurotransmitter chemistry in the central auditory system. Front Neurol 2014;5:227.  Back to cited text no. 57
    
58.
Sattler R, Tymianski M. Molecular mechanisms of glutamate receptor-mediated excitotoxic neuronal cell death. Mol Neurobiol 2001; 24(1-3):107-29.  Back to cited text no. 58
    
59.
Bilak M, Kim J, Potashner SJ, Bohne BA, Morest DK. New growth of axons in the cochlear nucleus of adult chinchillas after acoustic trauma. Exp Neurol 1997;147:256-68.  Back to cited text no. 59
    
60.
Kaltenbach JA, McCaslin DL. Increases in spontaneous activity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus following exposure to high intensity sound: a possible neural correlate of tinnitus. Aud Neurosci 1996;3:57-78.  Back to cited text no. 60
    
61.
Kaltenbach JA, Godfrey DA, Neumann JB, McCaslin DL, Afman CE, Zhang J. Changes in spontaneous neural activity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus following exposure to intense sound: relation to threshold shift. Hear Res 1998; 124(1-2):78-84.  Back to cited text no. 61
    
62.
Zhang JS, Kaltenbach JA. Increases in spontaneous activity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of the rat following exposure to high-intensity sound. Neurosci Lett 1998;250:197-200.  Back to cited text no. 62
    
63.
Kaltenbach JA. The dorsal cochlear nucleus as a participant in the auditory, attentional and emotional components of tinnitus. Hear Res 2006;216-217:224-34.  Back to cited text no. 63
    
64.
Manzoor NF, Gao Y, Licari F, Kaltenbach JA. Comparison and contrast of noise-induced hyperactivity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus and inferior colliculus. Hear Res 2013;295:114-23.  Back to cited text no. 64
    
65.
Beyerl BD. Afferent projections to the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus in the rat. Brain Res 1978;145:209-23.  Back to cited text no. 65
    
66.
Brunso-Bechtold JK, Thompson GC, Masterton RB. HRP study of the organization of auditory afferents ascending to central nucleus of inferior colliculus in cat. J Comp Neurol 1981;197:705-22.  Back to cited text no. 66
    
67.
Coleman JR, Clerici WJ. Sources of projections to subdivisions of the inferior colliculus in the rat. J Comp Neurol 1987;262:215-26.  Back to cited text no. 67
    
68.
Cant NB, Benson CG. Parallel auditory pathways: projection patterns of the different neuronal populations in the dorsal and ventral cochlear nuclei. Brain Res Bull 2003;60(5-6):457-74.  Back to cited text no. 68
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Felix Frohlich
Research Scientist, Zentrum für klinische Technologieforschung, Warener Straße 7, Haus 49, 12683 Berlin
Germany
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/nah.NAH_30_18

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]



 

Top