Home Email this page Print this page Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size
Noise & Health  
 CURRENT ISSUE    PAST ISSUES    AHEAD OF PRINT    SEARCH   GET E-ALERTS    
 
Read this article

 


    Article Cited by others

THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF AUDITORY DISTRACTION

Cross-modal distraction by background speech: What role for meaning?

Marsh John E, Jones Dylan M

Year : 2010| Volume: 12| Issue : 49 | Page no: 210-216

   This article has been cited by
 
1 Updating working memory in aircraft noise and speech noise causes different fMRI activations
Bjrn Saetrevik,Patrik Srqvist
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 2014; : n/a
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
2 Disruption of writing by background speech: The role of speech transmission index
Marijke Keus van de Poll,Robert Ljung,Johan Odelius,Patrik Srqvist
Applied Acoustics. 2014; 81: 15
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
3 Predictability and distraction: Does the neural model represent postcategorical features?
John E. Marsh,Jan P. Rer,Raoul Bell,Axel Buchner
PsyCh Journal. 2014; 3(1): 58
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
4 Auditory distraction: A duplex-mechanism account
Robert W. Hughes
PsyCh Journal. 2014; 3(1): 30
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
5 Evidence for habituation of the irrelevant-sound effect on serial recall
Jan P. Rer,Raoul Bell,Axel Buchner
Memory & Cognition. 2013;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
6 How much does irrelevant speech impair employees work performance in open-plan offices?
Helena Jahncke
Noise & Vibration Worldwide. 2013; 44(9): 10
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
7 Cognitive performance during irrelevant speech: Effects of speech intelligibility and office-task characteristics
Helena Jahncke,Valtteri Hongisto,Petra Virjonen
Applied Acoustics. 2013; 74(3): 307
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
8 Cognitive performance during irrelevant speech: Effects of speech intelligibility and office-task characteristics
Jahncke, H. and Hongisto, V. and Virjonen, P.
Applied Acoustics. 2013; 74(3): 307-316
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar]
9 Open-plan office noise: The susceptibility and suitability of different cognitive tasks for work in the presence of irrelevant speech
Jahncke, H.
Noise and Health. 2012; 14(61): 315-320
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar]
10 The ineluctable modality of the audible: Perceptual determinants of auditory verbal short-term memory
Maidment, D.W. and Macken, W.J.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2012; 38(4): 989-997
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar]
11 Retrieval from memory: Vulnerable or inviolable?
Jones, D.M. and Marsh, J.E. and Hughes, R.W.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition. 2012; 38(4): 905-922
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar]
12 Disruption of writing processes by the semanticity of background speech
Sörqvist, P. and Nöstl, A. and Halin, N.
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 2012; 53(2): 97-102
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar]
13 Disruption of writing processes by the semanticity of background speech
PATRIK SRQVIST,ANATOLE NSTL,NIKLAS HALIN
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 2012; 53(2): 97
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
14 Auditory distraction and serial memory: The avoidable and the ineluctable
Jones, D.M. and Hughes, R.W. and MacKen, W.J.
Noise and Health. 2010; 12(49): 201-209
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar]