Home Email this page Print this page Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size
Noise & Health  
 CURRENT ISSUE    PAST ISSUES    AHEAD OF PRINT    SEARCH   GET E-ALERTS    
 
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


 
   Abstract
   Introduction
   Research Review
   Materials and Me...
   Results and Disc...
   Conclusions
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3792    
    Printed148    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded17    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 4    

Recommend this journal

 


 
ARTICLE Table of Contents   
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 45  |  Page : 189-193
Development of a noise prediction model under interrupted traffic flow conditions: A case study for Jaipur city

Department of Civil Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur, India

Click here for correspondence address and email
Date of Web Publication2-Oct-2009
 
  Abstract 

The objective of this study is to develop an empirical noise prediction model for the evaluation of equivalent noise levels (Leq) under interrupted traffic flow conditions. A new factor tendency to blow horn (A H ) was introduced in the conventional federal highway administrative noise prediction (FHWA) model and a comparative study was made between FHWA and modified FHWA models to evaluate the best suitability of the model. Monitoring and modeling of Leq were carried out at four selected intersections of Jaipur city. After comparison of the results, it was found that the modified FHWA model could be satisfactorily applied for Indian conditions as it gives acceptable results with a deviation of ΁3 dB (A). In addition, statistical analysis of the data comprising measured and estimated values shows a good agreement. Hence, the modified FHWA traffic noise prediction model can be applied to the cities having similar traffic conditions as in Jaipur city.

Keywords: Ambient noise levels, average difference, capacity ratio, horn, interrupted traffic flow condition, tendency to blow

How to cite this article:
Agarwal S, Swami BL, Gupta AB. Development of a noise prediction model under interrupted traffic flow conditions: A case study for Jaipur city. Noise Health 2009;11:189-93

How to cite this URL:
Agarwal S, Swami BL, Gupta AB. Development of a noise prediction model under interrupted traffic flow conditions: A case study for Jaipur city. Noise Health [serial online] 2009 [cited 2020 Nov 30];11:189-93. Available from: https://www.noiseandhealth.org/text.asp?2009/11/45/189/56211

  Introduction Top


Traffic is an important source of noise pollution which directly affects the human health. [1] It can be seen that the transportation sector is a major contributor of noise pollution. [2] In India, the number of vehicles is increasing at a rate of more than 7% per annum, which creates a serious threat of noise pollution. [3],[4]

Jaipur is the capital city of the state of Rajasthan. It has an annual growth rate of 4.9% for population and 12.75% for vehicles. [5] It clearly indicates that the public transport system is very inefficient and inadequate, resulting in extraordinary growth of personalized vehicles. Besides this, the heterogeneous nature of traffic, continuously plying on roads, develops the interrupted traffic flow conditions and is directly responsible for traffic congestion. It increases the tendency to blow a horn. [6]

In the present study, a new factor-tendency to blow horn (A H ) is introduced in the conventional FHWA model for calculation of equivalent noise levels, (Leq) under interrupted traffic flow conditions. For this, four highly busy intersections were selected for monitoring and modeling and an empirical model was developed .


  Research Review Top


Federal highway administrative noise prediction model (FHWA)

Traffic noise prediction algorithm is as [7]



where L 0 is the basic/reference noise level for a stream of vehicles and L i is adjustment applied.

The hourly Leq value for each category of vehicles is calculated using the following equation:



where Leq (c) = equivalent noise level, calculated by the conventional FHWA model, L 0 = basic/reference noise level, A vs = volume and speed correction, A D = distance correction and A S = ground cover correction.

Calculation of adjustment applied to the FHWA model

FHWA model calculates noise level through a series of adjustments applied which are discussed below. [8]

(1) Basic/reference noise level: it is the noise emitted by particular class of vehicles at a distance of 10 m from the nearest traffic lane. The reference noise level equation for various categories of vehicle on bituminous pavement is shown in [Table 1].

(2) Volume and speed adjustment: it has been adopted as suggested by the FHWA model. The equation is given as



where Q = traffic flow of each vehicle category (vehicles per hour), v = speed in kmph and D 0 = reference distance (= 10m).

(1) Distance adjustment: It is given in Equation 4:



where α = the value of α is different for different locations. It depends on the ground cover coefficient (ranging from 0 to 0.75). In the present study, it is taken as 0 and 0.25.

Equivalent noise level for each category of vehicle is evaluated using Equation (2) and then combined logarithmically to get the total Leq (c) value. It is given in the Equation (5).




  Materials and Methods Top


Four heavy to medium busy commercial corridors of Jaipur city were selected for the present study, covering commercial land use only. Details of each site are given in [Table 2].

At each location, measurements were made when there was a reasonable traffic activity (in general from 10 am to 7 pm). Readings of equivalent observed noise levels (Leq [o]) were recorded at 10-min intervals. Leq (o) values (in dB [A]) for each hour were obtained by integrating all recorded values.

Various other traffic parameters i.e., classified traffic volume and traffic speed with the road geometrics were monitored at various identified locations of Jaipur city. "Sound Level Meter CYGNET-2021" having digital display was used to record the equivalent noise level at different selected locations. The classified traffic speed was recorded at all the selected locations using the "Doppler Radar Speedometer Model-MK-11."

The sound level meter (SLM) was mounted on a stand at a height of 1.2 m above the ground level and was located at 7.5 m distance from the center line on the road way during interrupted traffic flow conditions. The classified two directional traffic volumes were recorded manually. Traffic composition in the study area included, two wheelers, three wheelers, cars, jeeps, vans, buses, and mini buses, light commercial vehicles (LCV's) and trucks.


  Results and Discussion Top


[Table 3] represents the Leq (o) and Leq (c) for all the four locations. It was found that there was an unexplained difference of 5-15 dB (A) between Leq (o) and Leq (c) values. For calculation of this unexplained noise difference, a new correction factor i.e., tendency to blow horn (A H ) was introduced in the conventional FHWA model. For calculation of this new factor, a logarithmic graph between capacity ratio (ratio between calculated capacity to standard capacity in 1 hour) and average difference (difference between Leq (o) and Leq (c)) was plotted using Microsoft excel and the equation for the best-fit curve (Y = A + B* log X) was developed for all selected locations. A combined graph was developed for all investigated locations. The shape of the curve so obtained is given as shown in [Figure 1].

The above mentioned curve gave the following equation with the value of R 2 = 0.5524.



where X = capacity ratio.

It was found that the value of R 2 =0.5524 (as presented in [Figure 1]),was not very good. But, if the same study was applied to the individual sites, it would give better R 2 value. Details are given in [Table 4] and obtained curve is given in [Figure 2].

Since, the main aim of this study was to develop a generalized form of the modified FHWA model, which can be applied for the whole city, hence a big dataet was taken by clubbing together the observations at four different sites in order to develop a common equation. As, there were huge differences among road geometrical dimensions, road conditions, traffic characteristics and population density at all investigated locations, big dataset gave lesser R 2 value (R 2 = 0.5524) as in Equation (6).

Therefore, in Indian conditions the modified FHWA model may be taken as:



where Leq (m) = hourly equivalent noise level, calculated by the modified FHWA model, L 0 = basic/reference noise level, A vs = volume and speed correction, A D = distance correction, A S = round cover correction and A H = tendency to blow horn.

The above-mentioned equation was applied at all four selected locations of Jaipur city and Leq (m) values for all the identified locations are given in [Table 5]. It can be observed that the Leq (m) values were closer to the Leq (o) values. Hence, the modified FHWA model is significantly more applicable under the interrupted traffic flow conditions than the conventional FHWA model.

Model interpretation

To determine the applicability of the modified FHWA model, a XY scatter plot was drawn between Leq (o) vs Leq (c) and Leq (o) vs Leq (m) as shown in [Figure 3] and [Figure 4], and a best-fit line was also generated which gave an R 2 value of 0.4321 for the conventional FHWA model and 0.8337 for the modified FHWA model, respectively. Based on the findings, it can be observed that the modified FHWA model gives a strong correlation (R 2 =0.8337) than the conventional FHWA model. Testing of the goodness of fit to the models was also done by the paired the t-test technique. The paired t-test results of both FHWA model and modified FHWA models at 5% level significance are shown in [Table 6].

It was found that for a degree of freedom 78 at 5% level of significance, modified FHWA model gave t-statistical values less than the tabulated values of t-critical. Hence, it is concluded that this model is significantly fit for field data.


  Conclusions Top


Road traffic noise directly depends on the interrupted traffic flow conditions which causes congested traffic movement and increases the tendency to blow horn.

In the present study, a new factor i.e., tendency to blow horn (A H ) was introduced in the conventional FHWA model and a comparison was done among Leq (o), Leq (c), and Leq (m). The regression equation was also developed to produce better performance of the model. The statistical data analysis between predicted and observed Leq values was carried out to determine the suitability of the model. It can be concluded that the modified FHWA model gives significantly higher correlation coefficient values and can be applied for the calculation of road traffic noise under interrupted traffic flow conditions in urban areas of Indian cities.

 
  References Top

1.Rao KV, Padmaja P. Ambient noise level monitoring in Gwalior at various zones. J Environ Pollution 1999;2:211-4.   Back to cited text no. 1      
2.Murugesan R. Noise nuisance by road traffic assessment and control. Indian Highways 1997;25:25-31.  Back to cited text no. 2      
3.Sharma N. Vehicular pollution modelling in India. J Inst Engg 2005;85:46-53.  Back to cited text no. 3      
4.Rajakumar HN, Gowda Mahalinga RM. Road traffic noise prediction model under interrupted traffic flow condition. Environ Monit Assess 2008;13:151-8.  Back to cited text no. 4      
5.Srinivas DS. Energy, environment linkages of urban transport sector in India. Indian Highways 1996;24:27-37.  Back to cited text no. 5      
6.Choudhary R, Patanayak SK, Gupta AB, Vyas AK, Swami BL. Application And modification of FHWA model for noise prediction at congested commercial location of Jaipur city. Indian J Environ Protect 2003;23:907-12.  Back to cited text no. 6      
7.Bhattacharya CC, Jain SS, Singh SP, Parida M, Mittal N. Development of comprehensive highway noise model for Indian condition. J Indian Roads Congr 2001;62:453-87.  Back to cited text no. 7      
8.Nirjar RS, Jain SS, Singh SP, Parida M, Katiyar VS, Mittal N. A study of transport related noise pollution in Delhi. J Inst Eng 2003;84:6-15.  Back to cited text no. 8      

Top
Correspondence Address:
Bajrang L Swami
Civil Engineering Department, Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur 302 017, Rajasthan
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.56211

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]

This article has been cited by
1 Road traffic noise assessment and modeling in Bhubaneswar, India: A comparative and comprehensive monitoring study
Swain, B.K. and Goswami, S. and Panda, S.K.
International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering. 2012; 5(5): 1358-1370
[Pubmed]
2 Road traffic noise assessment and modeling of Sambalpur city, India: A comprehensive, comparative and complete study
Pradhan, A.C. and Swain, B.K. and Goswami, S.
Journal of Ecophysiology and Occupational Health. 2012; 12(3-4): 51-63
[Pubmed]
3 Dynamics of road traffic noise in Bhadrak city, India
Swain, B.K. and Panda, S.K. and Goswami, S.
Journal of Environmental Biology. 2012; 33(6): 1087-1092
[Pubmed]
4 Comprehensive approach for the development of traffic noise prediction model for Jaipur city
Sheetal Agarwal, B. L. Swami
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2011; 172(1-4): 113
[VIEW] | [DOI]



 

Top