| ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2012 | Volume
: 14
| Issue : 61 | Page : 303--306 |
Community response to noise
Takashi Yano1, Truls Gjestland2, Soogab Lee3
1 Department of Architecture, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kumamoto University, Kurokami 2-39-1, Chuo Ku, Kumamoto 860-8555, Japan
2 Department of Acoustics SINTEF IKT, Strindvegen 4, Trondheim, Norway
3 Director, Center for Environmental Noise and Vibration, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence Address:
Takashi Yano
Kurokami 2-39-1, Chuo Ku, Kumamoto 860-8555
Japan
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.104898
Activities from 2008 to 2011 by ICBEN community response to noise team were summarized. That is, individual community-based indexes such as community tolerance Level, Zuricher Fluglarm Index (ZFI) and Frankfurter Fluglarm Index (FFI/FNI) were newly proposed, differences in railway bonus between Europe and Asia were discussed by a Swedish survey, socio-acoustic surveys were reported from developing countries, and annoyance equivalents and dominant source models were proposed as the adequate combined noise model. Furthermore, not only negative, but also positive aspects of sound were discussed as soundscape studies. Finally, seven items were listed as future team activities.
[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
|
Search Pubmed for
