Home Email this page Print this page Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size
Noise & Health  
 CURRENT ISSUE    PAST ISSUES    AHEAD OF PRINT    SEARCH   GET E-ALERTS    
 
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


 
   Abstract
  Background
  Procedure
   Epigenetic effec...
   Discussion and c...
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1724    
    Printed84    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded9    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
  Table of Contents    
REVIEW ARTICLE  
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 107  |  Page : 77-89
Noise induced epigenetic effects: A systematic review

Section of Occupational Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy

Click here for correspondence address and email
Date of Web Publication31-Dec-2020
 
  Abstract 


Background: Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is one of the leading causes of acquired sensorineural hearing loss. However, molecular mechanisms responsible for its pathogenesis remain to be elucidated. Epigenetic changes, i.e. DNA methylation, histone and microRNA expression modifications may function as a link between noise exposure and hearing loss. Therefore, the aim of the present review was to assess whether epigenetic alterations may serve as biomarkers of noise exposure or early effect. Materials and Methods: A systematic review of studies available in Pubmed, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science databases was performed. Results: Noise exposure was able to induce alterations in DNA methylation levels in workers and animal models, resulting in expression changes of genes related to hearing loss and also to extra-auditory effects. Differently expressed microRNAs were determined in NIHL workers compared to noise-exposed subjects with normal hearing, supporting their possible role as biomarkers of effect. Acoustic trauma affected histon acethylation and methylation levels in animals, suggesting their influence in the pathogenesis of acute noise-induced damage and their role as targets for potential therapeutic treatments. Conclusions: Although preliminary data suggest a relationship between noise and epigenetic effects, the limited number of studies, their different methodologies and the lack of adequate characterization of acoustic insults prevent definite conclusions. In this context, further research aimed to define the epigenetic impact of workplace noise exposure and the role of such alterations in predicting hearing loss may be important for the adoption of correct risk assessment and management strategies in occupational settings.

Keywords: DNA methylation, histone modification, hearing loss, occupational exposure, microRNA

How to cite this article:
Leso V, Fontana L, Finiello F, De Cicco L, Luigia Ercolano M, Iavicoli I. Noise induced epigenetic effects: A systematic review. Noise Health 2020;22:77-89

How to cite this URL:
Leso V, Fontana L, Finiello F, De Cicco L, Luigia Ercolano M, Iavicoli I. Noise induced epigenetic effects: A systematic review. Noise Health [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 May 6];22:77-89. Available from: https://www.noiseandhealth.org/text.asp?2020/22/107/77/305734



  Background Top


Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) represents one of the most common worldwide types of acquired sensorineural hearing loss besides the age-related form.[1],[2] Among workplace hazards, occupational noise is one of the most common, affecting the health of exposed workers and potentially responsible for the occupational NIHL (ONIHL), which is a work-related medical condition characterised by a permanent sensorineural hearing loss due to an excessive exposure to high levels of noise in workplace settings.[3],[4]

The rapid increase in the number of people exposed to the hazardous effects of noise in both industrialized and developing countries, the 7% to 21% prevalence of ONIHL among exposed workers,[5],[6],[7] together with the disabling consequences deriving from such disorder,[8] makes NIHL, and particularly ONIHL, a major public and occupational health problem.

The pathogenesis of NIHL relies on the complex interplay between genetic and environmental factors.[9] Susceptibility to the noise effects shows a relevant interindividual difference, meaning that an exposure to equal noise intensity levels may result in greatly different hearing impairments.[10],[11],[12] Long or repeated exposure to sounds at or >85 dB can cause hearing loss inducing the irreversible death or apoptosis of the specialized sensory hair epithelium of the basilar membrane of the organ of Corti in the cochlea, the inner ear part responsible for hearing.[13] Additionally, acute acoustic trauma, intended as a short exposure to intense impulse sounds of 100–150 dB, can cause hearing loss or impairment too.[14]

Although numerous studies revealed that multiple factors are responsible for the development of NIHL, including increased oxidative stress, reduced blood flow, disruption of calcium homeostasis, and mechanical trauma, the mechanisms by which the cochlea is damaged following noise exposure are not entirely clear.[15],[16],[17],[18] The lack of comprehensive understanding of the causal molecular mechanisms underlying noise-induced damage, both in acute and chronic conditions of exposure, is responsible for the lack of established therapeutic strategies for prevention or amelioration of such disabling disorder and for the poor prognosis of the NIHL.[18] Therefore, due to the disease burden and disability associated with hearing impairment, NIHL deserves a high priority of research to develop innovative screening and therapies.

In this scenario, epigenetics, referred to as changes that alter gene transcription in the absence of direct alterations to the genetic sequence, may function as a link between noise exposure and hearing loss.[19] Alterations in DNA methylation, post-translational histone modifications, and changes in microRNAs expression, as the most used mechanisms able to initiate and sustain epigenetic information, have been tought to serve as stable non-invasive biomarkers of noise induced alterations.[20] Therefore, aim of the present review was to assess whether epigenetic changes may indicate noise exposure or occurrence of NIHL. This was finalized to gain insight into possible molecular mechanisms underlying noise exposure and to define possible early biological alterations that may act as suitable biomarkers of exposure, effect or susceptibility in exposed workers. Overall, from an occupational health perspective, this review may reveal a useful means to understand the relationship between noise exposure, auditory and extra-auditory related injuries. This may be important to extrapolate information to lead future reserch focused at the development of effective biological monitoring strategies, diagnostic possibilities, and potential treatments as well as to point out biological mechanisms and predictors of disease that may guide the adoption of the most effective preventive measures for exposed workers.


  Procedure Top


The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement (PRISMA) criteria were followed to perform a systematic literature search.[21] Studies addressing epigenetic effects induced by noise exposure, published until 15 March 2020, were identified by research on three principal scientific databases: PubMed, Scopus and ISIWeb of Science. A preliminary search was carried out for the terms “hearing or noise exposure” to assess the context of exposure and “epigenetic” as the investigation outcome, which were combined with the Boolean operator “AND”. The computerized search allowed to retrieve articles whose titles and abstracts were independently reviewed by two of the authors with the aim to select papers suitable for the review purposes. The following inclusion criteria were adopted: all types of human peer-reviewed research articles (i.e., cross-sectional, cohort, case-control studies) published in English, and exploring the noise exposure-epigenetic alterations relationship both in humans and in experimental animals. Exclusion criteria regarded reviews, case reports, conference papers, publications not focusing on the association between epigenetic effects and noise exposure, as well as all the papers published in languages other than English. The preliminary search retrieved 96, 147 and 102 references through PubMed, Scopus and ISI Web of Science databases, respectively, for a total of 345 articles [Figure 1]. After duplicate removal, 177 articles remained. Among those, studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded according to the following reasons: 161 because considered out of the topic from the title and abstract analysis; 11 as review articles, 1 as a conference paper and 1 as published in a language other than English. Indeed, three publications could be identified in this preliminary phase. Therefore, we extended our search including the following terms “hearing or noise exposure”, individually combined with “DNA methylation”, “microRNA” and “histone”, that allowed to include six additional papers. All full texts of the articles considered valuable for the aim of our review were obtained and a critical evaluation was performed. Overall, our search retrieved a total of nine publications for review.
Figure 1: Flow diagram of literature search

Click here to view



  Epigenetic effects induced by noise exposure Top


Noise exposure was reported to induce epigenetic effects, such as DNA methylation changes,[22],[23] histone modifications,[24],[25],[26],[27] as well as alterations in non-coding microRNAs (miRNAs),[28],[29],[30] both in occupational and experimental settings [Table 1],[Table 2],[Table 3]. The following paragraphs will attempt to summarize such effects with the aim to point out currently available data and critical issues that require further research in order also to conceive epigenetic contribution to risk assessment and management strategies in noise exposure as well as NIHL.
Table 1: Studies addressing DNA-methylation changes induced by noise exposure

Click here to view
Table 2: Studies addressing micro-RNA expression changes induced by noise exposure

Click here to view
Table 3: Studies addressing histone modifications induced by noise exposure

Click here to view


DNA methylation

DNA methylation is recognized as an essential epigenetic mark that regulates chromatin structure and gene expression throughout the genome.[31] Understanding how noise exposures may affect DNA methylation patterns may help to elucidate the relationship between noise and its possible auditory and extra-auditory effects [Table 1].[23] In this context, Wang et al.[22] investigated DNA methylation and gene expression abnormalities induced by blast overpressure exposures in male “breachers”, military and law enforcement professionals subacutely and chronically exposed to repeated blasts as part of their job duties. Epigenetic effects were evaluated with respect to blast subacute exposures, intended as controlled, low-level blast exposures experienced during a 10-day explosive breaching course, and to the number of cumulative blast exposure events (< or >40) during the career in the military service. No different methylated regions could be identified comparing pre- and post-blast exposure blood DNA methylation patterns in subjects attending the above-mentioned training courses. When DNA methylation analysis was conducted considering cumulative exposure, 10 differently hyper-methylated regions resulted positively associated to the highest lifetime exposure with corresponding gene expression changes. Interestingly, hypermethylation localized in the promoter region of the antisense transcript within the paired box gene 8 (PAX8), resulted responsible for the control of the expression of thyroid-specific genes involved in the gland function as well as in sleep duration suggesting the possible epigenetic control of potential extra-auditory effects of noise.[32],[33],[34] DNA methylation and gene expression changes were also investigated in relation to the more frequently self-reported symptoms, particularly tinnitus. The authors identified genes with differential DNA methylation changes associated with symptoms of tinnitus in the high vs. low career breaching groups. Differently hypermethylated regions involved the potassium voltage-gated channel, Isk-related family, member 1 (KCNE1), and the cytochrome P450 family 2, subfamily E, member 1 (CYP2E1) genes, whose transcriptional expression resulted significantly reduced. Interestingly, both KCNE1 and CYP2E1 genes have been reported to be implicated in noise-related hearing loss in human genetics and animal investigations, respectively.[35],[36],[37],[38],[39],[40]

DNA methylation changes were reported by Guo et al.[23] when exploring the effects of environmental noise exposure in vivo. They analysed the global DNA methylation levels in LINE-1 untranslated regions and the methylation of five selected genes expressed in different regions of the brain, i.e. the frontal lobe, hippocampus, inferior colliculus, and medulla oblongata, of male Wistar rats exposed to moderate intensity noise for 3 or 21 days, as short and long-term exposures, respectively. Following short term noise exposure, only the DNA methylation of the catechol-O-methyltransferase (Comt) gene was significantly increased in medulla oblongata. After long-term exposure, Comt methylation was significantly increased in the inferior colliculus, while the melanocortin 2 receptor (Mc2r) gene demonstrated a significantly decreased methylation in hippocampus. As far as the Comt gene is concerned, it codes for an enzyme involved in the dopaminergic circuit, in turn linked to cognitiveness, working memory and depression.[41] The hypermethylation of this gene in the inferior colliculus following a long-term noise exposure, which consequently leads to a reduced expression of the enzyme encoded by the same gene, could suggest a role of chronic noise exposure on certain brain functions, including memory and cognition, and in the increased risk of depression. Similarly, as regards Mc2r, receptor of the adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) involved in the response to stressors,[42] the finding of hypomethylation of this gene in the hippocampus after chronic noise exposure, may be associated with memory deficit and cognition impairment. Global DNA methylation in LINE-1 significantly increased in the medulla oblongata, but not in the other brain regions examined at the same time point. However, the differences detected in the DNA methylation following long-term noise exposure, with respect to short-term one, have not been fully explained and no relation could be detected for specific genes, brain regions and functions.

Micro RNAs

MicroRNAs, small 20–22 nucleotide molecules, represent a new class of noncoding RNA genes able to regulate cellular functions by modulating mRNA expression levels.[13] Investigations on miRNA functions in the auditory system have been mainly focused on their roles in inner ear development [Table 2].[43],[44],[45],[46],[47] However, the role of miRNAs in noise-induced cochlear pathogenesis is yet to be established, and only preliminary data are available on the potential effects on miRNAs expression induced by noise exposure in humans [28],[29] and animal models.[30]

A case-control study investigated the plasma miRNA profile of NIHL male patients, noise-exposed male individuals with normal hearing, both employed in a textile industry, and of an unexposed control group with normal hearing.[28] The authors found that the NIHL group showed 73 miRNAs with at least 1.5-fold differential expression levels compared to noise-exposed controls at the microarray analysis, suggesting a possible specific mRNA expression pattern indicative of a hearing loss occurrence. Among the miRNAs differently expressed in NIHL patients and noise-exposed controls, miR-16-5p, miR-24-3p, miR-185-5p, miR-451a, all molecules implicated in the regulation of oxidative stress responses, demonstrated a significant up-regulation in the first group. However, an additional validation analysis demonstrated that miR-24-3p, miR-185-5p, miR-451a were all significantly downregulated in both noise-exposed groups compared to unexposed controls. Interestingly, the findings of a downregulation of key miRNAs in noise exposed vs. unexposed subjects are in line with previous miRNA expression research of oxidative stress-related changes in cultured cells derived from the organ of Corti.[48] Excessive noise may generate, in the cochlea, an over-production of reactive oxygen species which may be responsible for changes in the expression of miRNAs involved in the oxidative stress response. Such miRNA expression pattern may therefore be involved in NIHL pathogenesis although the causal association and their role as possible early biomarkers of noise effects need further investigation. Importantly, the same additional verification confirmed that miR-185-5p and miR-451a were significantly upregulated in the NIHL group compared to the noise-exposed subjects as previously demonstrated. This may support the potential role of these two miRNAs as possible biomarkers of noise exposure and hearing loss damage.

Comparably, a different miRNA expression was detected in ONIHL workers compared to noise-exposed individuals with normal hearing enrolled as controls. In fact, seven differentially expressed miRNAs were determined between the two groups at the microarray analysis, with a >1.5 fold changed expression: three were upregulated (hsa-miR-3162-5p, hsa-miR-4484, hsa-miR- 1229-5p), and four were downregulated (hsa-miR-6752-3p, hsa-miR-6824-3p, hsa-miR-4769-3p, hsa-miR-4652-3p) in ONIHL subjects. The upregulation of the above-mentioned miRNAs was confirmed also using the real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) as an additional analysis. However, this technique found a significant increase of serum expression only for miR-1229-5p in ONIHL group suggesting that such molecule could be implicated in hearing loss pathogenesis. The analyses of the predicted target genes of hsa-miR-1229-5p demonstrated that they were involved in a great number of biological processes and molecular functions, e.g. ion, nucleotide and ATP binding, transcription regulator and protein kinase activities. Among those involved genes, the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway has been determined, reported to function as a regulatory pathway in human genetic deafness and in the inner hair cell survival,[49] thus decreasing the susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss in animals.[50] MiR-1229-5p may contribute to the pathogenesis of ONIHL producing a post-transcriptional repression of MAPK1 thus reducing a self-defensive mechanism against noise exposure. Overall, these findings may suggest serum miR-1229-5p level as a possible innovative biomarker for ONIHL prediction.

MiRNAs have been also implicated in responses to acoustic overstimulation. In this regard, Patel et al.[30] investigated the role of miRNAs in cochlear apoptotic pathogenesis after acoustic trauma in exposed Sprague Dawley rats. A significant auditory brainstem response (ABR) threshold shift and apoptotic activity, characterized by an increased percentage of cells with condensated nuclei and increased caspase-3 activity were demonstrated after the exposure to intense noise. Gene expression analysis of noise-traumatized cochleae revealed time-dependent transcriptional changes in the expression of miRNAs. Only miR-331-5p was significantly upregulated at 2 h post-noise exposure, while returned to a baseline level at 1 d post-noise exposure. At this time point, 20 miRNAs were significantly down-regulated with a fold change equal to or greater than 2.5, an alteration that was not evident at 2 h post-noise exposure. This may suggest that the noise-induced miRNA expression changes are time-specific and involve different sets of miRNAs at different time points. When target prediction analysis was performed to verify the possible involvement of potential regulators of the degenerative process of the cochlea following acoustic overstimulation, a significant upregulation of Taok1 mRNA, a target of miRNA-183, was demonstrated. In non-cochlear tissues, Taok1 has been associated with activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in response to stress and DNA damage[51],[52],[53] and apoptosis induction.[54] This may suggest its possible role in the regulation of cochlear response to acoustic trauma through the regulation of apoptotic pathways.

Histone modifications

Post-translational modifications of histones have emerged as key regulators of genomic activity without affecting DNA sequence.[27] Histone acetylation catalyzed by the activity of histone acetyltransferases (HATs), and deacetylation catalyzed by histone deacetylases (HDACs) are responsible for the activation and repression of gene transcription, respectively, influencing the interactions between histones and DNA.[55],[56] Therefore, an imbalance in histone acetylation may be implicated in a wide range of transcriptional dysfunction, gene silencing and neurodegenerative disorders.[57],[58],[59]

Preliminary evidence in animal models is available concerning the role of HDACs in hearing impairment [Table 3].[24],[25],[26],[27] Wen et al.[24], 1 h following an acute traumatic noise in a CBA/J mouse model, demonstrated a significant increase in the expression of HDAC1 and HDAC4, and a decrease in the levels of acetyl-histone H3 (Lys9) (H3K9ac) protein compared to unexposed controls. Significant hearing impairment was evident 2 weeks following noise exposure in mice with a reduction in the number of outer hair cells (OHCs). Interestingly, a pre-treatment with an HDAC inhibitor, the suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) significantly prevented such molecular and morphological alterations. This suggests a role for HDAC enzymes in NIHL. These results are in line with subsequent findings obtained by Chen et al.[25] who determined increased levels of HDAC1, HDAC2 and HDAC3 prevalently in the nuclei of cochlear cells in CBA/J mice following a traumatic noise exposure. As previously demonstrated, the levels of H3K9ac resulted significantly decreased in the nuclei of OHCs and marginal cells of the stria vascularis, suggesting that histone H3 tail epigenetic modification could be involved in noise-induced OHCs loss and NIHL. Inhibition of HDAC1, HDAC2, or HDAC3 with small-interfering RNAs decreased the expression of the target HDAC in OHCs, but did not ameliorate the permanent threshold shift (PTS) induced by the noise exposure. Conversely, the SAHA showed beneficial effects on OHCs loss, and reduced PTS. Comparably, Yang et al.[26] confirmed such previous results demonstrating that traumatic noise exposure significantly increased HDAC1 expression in the nuclei of OHCs and inner hair cells (IHCs) and decreased H3K9ac expression in guinea pig cochlear tissues. The administration of the HDAC inhibitor, sodium butyrate, partially recovered these effects limiting the effects on OHCs and the PTS. Additionally, the sodium butyrate treatment reduced the noise-induced oxidative stress, decreasing the 3-nytrotyrosine upregulation induced by the traumatic exposure suggesting an oto-protective role of the HDAC inhibitors by limiting the overproduction of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. These findings suggest that histone acetylation is involved in the pathogenesis of noise-induced OHCs death and hearing loss. Although the exact molecular mechanisms underlying the protective effects of targeting histone deacetylases are still not understood, this treatment may characterize a strategy for protection against NIHL.

Apart from modifications in histone acetylation, also histone methylation has been investigated for a possible function in hearing loss development.[60],[61] A traumatic noise exposure, able to affect OHCs and PTS in mice, resulted in the activation of the G9a, a major histone lysine methyltransferase responsible for histone H3 lysine 9 dimethylation (H3K9me2) in both OHCs and IHCs, some spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) as well as marginal cells 1 hour after exposure.[27] Interestingly, the inhibition of G9a by treatment with BIX 01294 or G9a siRNA reduced noise-induced losses of OHCs and attenuated NIHL. These findings suggest that epigenetic modifications of H3K9me2 may play a role in NIHL and may function as a pharmacological target to prevent NIHL.


  Discussion and conclusion Top


This review represents the first attempt to comprehensively assess the possible role of epigenetic alterations in contributing to the pathogenesis of noise-induced injury, functioning both as potential biomarkers of early damage, possible effective diagnostic tools as well as potential target of treatments to prevent/ameliorate hearing loss. Although the number of available investigations on the topic is limited, some interesting issues for the discussion emerged from our revision.

Concerning acute to subacute noise exposure, no alterations in blood DNA methylation in military personnel could be detected following 10 day-blast exposure trainings (∼12 pounds per square inch.),[22] while an in vivo experiment demonstrated that moderate intensity noise (70–75 dB) for 3 days was able to increase the DNA methylation of the Comt gene in the medulla oblongata of exposed animals.[23] These latter results suggest that early epigenetic alterations may occur at even not so high levels of noise in a gene that has been reported to be involved with stress response, cognition, anxiety, that may be all factors influenced by the noise insult.[62],[63],[64],[65] However, the different species susceptibility to noise injury, the diverse type of noise exposure in terms of duration and intensity, as well as the variable biological matrices analysed may all play a role in affecting results and need further investigation. Acoustic trauma induced by broadband continuous noise exposure to 98-122 dB SPL for 2 to 3 hours was able to induce an increased expression of the enzymes HDAC 1–4[24],[25],[26] involved into the deacetylation of the lysine 9 residue on histone 3, with a consequent reduction of the H3K9ac levels 1 h post-exposure. Additionally, a comparable noise exposure induced the activation of the methyltransferase G9a, responsible for the hypermethylation of the H3K9 site.[27] These preliminary data support the possible role of histone acetylation and methylation levels in the pathogenesis of acute noise-induced damage. This was further confirmed by the capacity of HDAC inhibitors to reduce NIHL, suggesting their possible role as potential therapeutic strategies for the prevention of hearing loss.

When the epigenetic impact of chronic, cumulative noise exposure along a professional career was assessed compared to shorter periods of exposure, some DNA methylation differences emerged.[22] In fact, several hypermethylated regions resulted associated with lifetime exposure compared to the absence of subacute alterations. It may be argued that DNA methylation effects, which represent highly stable, long-lasting effect indicators, may be more likely representative of cumulative noise exposures, with respect to acute or proximal events. Interestingly, changes in DNA methylation resulted also positively associated with noise-related symptoms reported by military and veterans, such as tinnitus. In line with these results, sub-chronic conditions of exposure have been demonstrated to induce different epigenetic alterations in animals, i.e. increased Comt and LINE-1, and decreased Mr2c methylation, compared to the previous described subacute effects.[23]

Moreover, possible time-dependent trends have been described in epigenetic effects. Patel et al.[30] demonstrated that a traumatic noise exposure caused a reversible up-regulation of a single miRNA and a significant down-regulation of a greater number of miRNAs, 2 hours and 1-day post-exposure, respectively. This temporal pattern of changes may be related to the progression of sensory cell degeneration post-noise insult.[66],[67] The growth of the noise-induced lesion is expected to induce more cells to degenerate and consequently, more miRNAs to be differently expressed. Another possible factor influencing the temporal change in miRNA expression may be the differences in damaging triggers during the diverse phases of cochlear damage pathogenesis. Mechanical stress may function as an initial cause of cochlear effect, while other mechanisms of action, i.e. energy exhaustion,[68] oxidative stress,[69] and ionic imbalance,[70],[71],[72] may contribute to longer-term damage.

The gene expression analysis in relation to the epigenetic modifications may also be important to understand the pathogenesis of noise-induced effects. DNA methylation changes detected by Wang et al.[22] were associated with a decreased expression of KCNE1 and CYP2E1 genes, directly involved in auditory processing and sound perception. Such kind of analysis may also support the understanding of possible noise-induced extra-auditory effects as suggested by the reduced expression of the PAX8 gene in response to the increased DNA methylation in its promoter region, which may affect the control of the expression of thyroid-specific genes and thyroid development, as well as sleep patterns. Also changes in Comt and Mc2r DNA methylation may influence certain brain functions, including memory and cognition, as a possible outcome of chronic noise exposure.[23] Additionally, Patel et al.,[30] exploring the miRNA/mRNA target pairs showed that the down-regulation of miR-183 was associated with a Taok1 mRNA overexpression, responsible for the activation of the MAPK pathway potentially involved in cochlear apoptosis as a mechanism of noise damage. Overall, these data can assist the future development of target molecular therapeutic perspectives in reducing noise-induced cochlear damage.

Importantly, as suggested for plasma miR-1229-5p[29] and miR-185-5p and miR-451[28] in occupationally noise-exposed workers, the differences in microRNA and downstream gene expression alterations between ONIHL patients and noise-exposed subjects with normal hearing, may be important to understand the molecular responses to noise exposure and to define possible novel biomarkers to predict and eventually prevent its development and progression. However, to achieve more sustained conclusions in this regard, further research is necessary to prove the causal association between miRNA changes and noise exposure, and to determine whether these miRNAs may effectively function as biomarkers of exposure and/or early effect.

Finally, some limitations emerged from our revision should be stressed in order to plan methodologically adequate investigations able to provide more informative data. In this context, additional studies should include a greater number of subjects/animals to avoid statistical power limitations due to the small sample size. Most of the analysed investigations employed different kind of exposures. As the impact of noise depends upon the context and characteristics of the acoustic insult, including duration, intensity, intermittency, frequency, and predictability,[73],[74],[75],[76] a future standardized epigenetic research approach should provide a precise description of noise characteristics in order to achieve more comparable and effective results. Additionally, most of the reviewed studies could only applied a candidate gene approach analysis, uneffective to identify all genes that are potentially affected by the exposure. Therefore, an extended analytical strategy, on suitable and routinary applicable biological matrices, should be pursued. Finally, a longitudinal methodological design, for both genetic and symptom-based studies, appears necessary to understand molecular alterations time-dependent trends and to verify their possible employment as early biomarkers for hearing damage, particularly in chronic occupational exposure settings.

In conclusion, additional studies are necessary to overcome the current gap in noise exposure-epigenetic changes relationship. From an occupational health perspective, to define the epigenetic impact of workplace noise exposure and the role of such alterations in predicting hearing loss development may be absolutely important for a correct evaluation of risks, according also to an individually tailored-based approach. Additionally, epigenetic data may provide future support to the health surveillance plans of chronically exposed workers, with the aim to detect early, maybe preclinical alterations, and therefore guiding the adoption/implementation of the most effective preventive and protective measures to avoid disabling hearing loss.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Concha-Barrientos M, Campbell-Lendrum D, Steenland K. Occupational noise: assessing the burden of disease from work-related hearing impairment at national and local levels. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2004. (WHO Environmental Burden of Disease Series, No. 9).  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Ding T, Yan A, Liu K. What is noise-induced hearing loss? Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2019;80:525-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Lie A, Skogstad M, Johnsen TS, Engdahl B, Tambs K. The prevalence of notched audiograms in a cross-sectional study of 12,055 railway workers. Ear Hear 2015;36:86-92.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Nelson DI, Nelson RY, Concha-Barrientos M, Fingerhut M. The global burden of occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Am J Ind Med 2005;48:446-58.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Metidieri MM, Rodrigues HF, Filho FJ, Ferraz DP, Neto AF, Torres S. Noise-Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL): literature review with a focus on occupational medicine. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013;17:208-12.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Van der Molen HF, de Vries SC, Stocks SJ, Warning J, Frings-Dresen MH. Incidence rates of occupational diseases in the Dutch construction sector, 2010-2014. Occup Environ Med 2016;73:350-2.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Lie A, Skogstad M, Johannessen HA, Tynes T, Mehlum IS, Nordby KC et al. Occupational noise exposure and hearing: a systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2016;89:351-72.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
WHO. Deafness and hearing loss. 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/hearing-loss (Accessed March 19, 2020).  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Sliwinska-Kowalska M, Pawelczyk M. Contribution of genetic factors to noise-induced hearing loss: a human studies review. Mutat Res 2013;752:61-5  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Pawelczyk M, Van Laer L, Fransen E, Rajkowska E, Konings A, Carlsson PI et al. Analysis of gene polymorphisms associated with K ion circulation in the inner ear of patients susceptible and resistant to noise-induced hearing loss. Ann Hum Genet 2009;73:411-21.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Konings A, Van Laer L, Van Camp G. Genetic studies on noise-induced hearing loss: a review. Ear Hear 2009;30:151-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Le Prell CG, Yamashita D, Minami SB, Yamasoba T, Miller JM. Mechanisms of noise-induced hearing loss indicate multiple methods of prevention. Hear Res 2007;226:22-43.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Miguel V, Cui JY, Daimiel L, Espinosa-Díez C, Fernández-Hernando C, Kavanagh TJ et al. The role of MicroRNAs in environmental risk factors, noise-induced hearing loss, and mental stress. Antioxid Redox Signal 2018;28:773-96.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Wada T, Sano H, Nishio SY, Kitoh R, Ikezono T, Iwasaki S et al. Differences between acoustic trauma and other types of acute noise-induced hearing loss in terms of treatment and hearing prognosis. Acta Otolaryngol 2017;137:48-52.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Hu BH, Henderson D, Yang WP. The impact of mitochondrial energetic dysfunction on apoptosis in outer hair cells of the cochlea following exposure to intense noise. Hear Res 2008;236:11-21.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Kamogashira T, Fujimoto C, Yamasoba T. Reactive oxygen species, apoptosis, and mitochondrial dysfunction in hearing loss. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:617207.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Kurabi A, Keithley EM, Housley GD, Ryan AF, Wong AC. Cellular mechanisms of noise-induced hearing loss. Hear Res 2017;349:129-37.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Sha SH, Schacht J. Emerging therapeutic interventions against noise-induced hearing loss. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2017;26:85-96.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Murgatroyd C, Wu Y, Bockmühl Y, Spengler D. The Janus face of DNA methylation in aging. Aging (Albany NY) 2010;2:107-10.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Mitchell PS, Parkin RK, Kroh EM, Fritz BR, Wyman SK, Pogosova-Agadjanyan EL et al. Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:10513-8.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2010;8:336-41.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Wang Z, Wilson CM, Mendelev N, Ge Y, Galfalvy H, Elder G et al. Acute and chronic molecular signatures and associated symptoms of blast exposure in military breachers. J Neurotrauma 2019.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Guo L, Li PH, Li H, Colicino E, Colicino S, Wen Y et al. Effects of environmental noise exposure on DNA methylation in the brain and metabolic health. Environ Res 2017;153:73-82.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Wen LT, Wang J, Wang Y, Chen FQ. Association between histone deacetylases and the loss of cochlear hair cells: role of the former in noise-induced hearing loss. Int J Mol Med 2015;36:534-40.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Chen J, Hill K, Sha SH. Inhibitors of histone deacetylases attenuate noise-induced hearing loss. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2016;17:289-302.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Yang DH, Xie J, Liu K, Peng Z, Guo JY, Yu SK et al. The histone deacetylase inhibitor sodium butyrate protects against noise-induced hearing loss in Guinea pigs. Neurosci Lett 2017;660:140-6.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Xiong H, Long H, Pan S, Lai R, Wang X, Zhu Y et al. Inhibition of histone methyltransferase g9a attenuates noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy and hearing loss. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2019;20:217-32.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Ding L, Liu J, Shen HX, Pan LP, Liu QD, Zhang HD et al. Analysis of plasma microRNA expression profiles in male textile workers with noise-induced hearing loss. Hear Res 2016;333:275-82.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Li YH, Yang Y, Yan YT, Xu LW, Ma HY, Shao YX et al. Analysis of serum microRNA expression in male workers with occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Braz J Med Biol Res 2018;51:e6426.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Patel M, Cai Q, Ding D, Salvi R, Hu Z, Hu BH. The miR-183/Taok1 target pair is implicated in cochlear responses to acoustic trauma. PLoS One 2013;8:e58471.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Moore LD, Le T, Fan G. DNA methylation and its basic function. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013;38:23-38.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Mansouri A, Chowdhury K, Gruss P. Follicular cells of the thyroid gland require Pax8 gene function. Nat Genet 1998;19:87-90.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Gottlieb DJ, Hek K, Chen TH, Watson NF, Eiriksdottir G, Byrne EM et al. Novel loci associated with usual sleep duration: the CHARGE Consortium Genome-Wide Association Study. Mol Psychiatry 2015;20:1232-9.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Jones SE, Tyrrell J, Wood AR, Beaumont RN, Ruth KS, Tuke MA et al. Genome-wide association analyses in 128, 266 individuals identifies new morningness and sleep duration loci. PLoS Genet 2016;12:e1006125.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Fechter LD, Gearhart C, Shirwany NA. Acrylonitrile potentiates noise-induced hearing loss in rat. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2004;5:90-8.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Van Laer L, Carlsson PI, Ottschytsch N, Bondeson ML, Konings A, Vandevelde A et al. The contribution of genes involved in potassium-recycling in the inner ear to noise-induced hearing loss. Hum Mutat 2006;27:786-95.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Pawełczyk M, Rajkowska E, Kotyło P, Dudarewicz A, Van Camp G, Śliwińska-Kowalska M. Analysis of inner ear potassium recycling genes as potential factors associated with tinnitus. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2012;25:356-64.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Ramakrishnan NA, Drescher MJ, Khan KM, Hatfield JS, Drescher DG. HCN1 and HCN2 proteins are expressed in cochlear hair cells: HCN1 can form a ternary complex with protocadherin 15 CD3 and F-actin-binding filamin A or can interact with HCN2. J Biol Chem 2012;287:3762846.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Kim YH, Holt JR. Functional contributions of HCN channels in the primary auditory neurons of the mouse inner ear. J Gen Physiol 2013;142:207-23.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Shen H, Liu W, Geng Q, Li H, Lu M, Liang P et al. Age-dependent up-regulation of hcn channels in spiral ganglion neurons coincide with hearing loss in mice. Front Aging Neurosci 2018;10:353.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Dickinson D, Elvevåg B. Genes, cognition and brain through a COMT lens. Neuroscience 2009;164:72-87.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Fridmanis D, Roga A, Klovins J. ACTH receptor (MC2R) specificity: what do we know about underlying molecular mechanisms? Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2017;8:13.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Weston MD, Pierce ML, Rocha-Sanchez S, Beisel KW, Soukup GA. MicroRNA gene expression in the mouse inner ear. Brain Res 2006;1111:95-104.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Friedman LM, Dror AA, Mor E, Tenne T, Toren G, Satoh T et al. MicroRNAs are essential for development and function of inner ear hair cells in vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:7915-20.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Lewis MA, Quint E, Glazier AM, Fuchs H, De Angelis MH, Langford C et al. An ENU-induced mutation of miR-96 associated with progressive hearing loss in mice. Nat Genet 2009;41:614-8.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Frucht CS, Santos-Sacchi J, Navaratnam DS. MicroRNA181a plays a key role in hair cell regeneration in the avian auditory epithelium. Neurosci Lett 2011;493:44-8.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Patel M, Hu BH. MicroRNAs in inner ear biology and pathogenesis. Hear Res 2012;287:6-14.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Wang Z, Liu Y, Han N, Chen X, Yu W, Zhang W et al. Profiles of oxidative stress-related microRNA and mRNA expression in auditory cells. Brain Res 2010;1346:14-25.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Stamatiou GA, Stankovic KM. A comprehensive network and pathway analysis of human deafness genes. Otol Neurotol 2013;34:961-70.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Kurioka T, Matsunobu T, Satoh Y, Niwa K, Endo S, Fujioka M et al. ERK2 mediates inner hair cell survival and decreases susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss. Sci Rep 2015;5:16839.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Hutchison M, Berman KS, Cobb MH. Isolation of TAO1, a protein kinase that activates MEKs in stress-activated protein kinase cascades. J Biol Chem 1998;273:28625-32.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Chen Z, Hutchison M, Cobb MH. Isolation of the protein kinase TAO2 and identification of its mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase binding domain. J Biol Chem 1999;274:28803-7.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Raman M, Earnest S, Zhang K, Zhao Y, Cobb MH. TAO kinases mediate activation of p38 in response to DNA damage. EMBO J 2007;26:2005-14.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Wu MF, Wang SG. Human TAO kinase 1 induces apoptosis in SH-SY5Y cells. Cell Biol Int 2008;32:151-6.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Layman WS, Zuo J. Epigenetic regulation in the inner ear and its potential roles in development, protection, and regeneration. Front Cell Neurosci 2015;8:446.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Lu X, Wang L, Yu C, Yu D, Yu G. Histone acetylation modifiers in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Front Cell Neurosci 2015;9:226.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.
Song C, Kanthasamy A, Anantharam V, Sun F, Kanthasamy AG. Environmental neurotoxic pesticide increases histone acetylation to promote apoptosis in dopaminergic neuronal cells: relevance to epigenetic mechanisms of neurodegeneration. Mol Pharmacol 2010;77:621-32.  Back to cited text no. 57
    
58.
Stilling RM, Fischer A. The role of histone acetylation in age-associated memory impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2011;96:19-26.  Back to cited text no. 58
    
59.
Gräff J, Tsai LH. Histone acetylation: molecular mnemonics on the chromatin. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013;14:97-111.  Back to cited text no. 59
    
60.
Tachibana M, Sugimoto K, Nozaki M, Ueda J, Ohta T, Ohki M et al. G9a histone methyltransferase plays a dominant role in euchromatic histone H3 lysine 9 methylation and is essential for early embryogenesis. Genes Dev 2002;16:1779-91.  Back to cited text no. 60
    
61.
Yokochi T, Poduch K, Ryba T, Lu J, Hiratani I, Tachibana M et al. G9a selectively represses a class of late-replicating genes at the nuclear periphery. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;10:19363-8.  Back to cited text no. 61
    
62.
Gogos JA, Morgan M, Luine V, Santha M, Ogawa S, Pfaff D et al. Catechol-O-methyltransferase-deficient mice exhibit sexually dimorphic changes in catecholamine levels and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:9991-6.  Back to cited text no. 62
    
63.
Hains AB, Arnsten AF. Molecular mechanisms of stress-induced prefrontal cortical impairment: implications for mental illness. Learn Mem 2008;15:551-64.  Back to cited text no. 63
    
64.
Papaleo F, Crawley JN, Song J, Lipska BK, Pickel J, Weinberger DR et al. Genetic dissection of the role of catechol-O-methyltransferase in cognition and stress reactivity in mice. J Neurosci 2008;28:8709-23.  Back to cited text no. 64
    
65.
Ursini G, Bollati V, Fazio L, Porcelli A, Iacovelli L, Catalani A et al. Stress-related methylation of the catechol-O-methyltransferase Val 158 allele predicts human prefrontal cognition and activity. J Neurosci 2011;31:6692-8.  Back to cited text no. 65
    
66.
Hu BH, Henderson D, Nicotera TM. Involvement of apoptosis in progression of cochlear lesion following exposure to intense noise. Hear Res 2002;16:62-71.  Back to cited text no. 66
    
67.
Yang WP, Henderson D, Hu BH, Nicotera TM. Quantitative analysis of apoptotic and necrotic outer hair cells after exposure to different levels of continuous noise. Hear Res 200;196:69-76.  Back to cited text no. 67
    
68.
Saunders JC, Dear SP, Schneider ME. The anatomical consequences of acoustic injury: a review and tutorial. J Acoust Soc Am 1985;78:833-60.  Back to cited text no. 68
    
69.
Henderson D, Bielefeld EC, Harris KC, Hu BH. The role of oxidative stress in noise-induced hearing loss. Ear Hear 2006;27:1-19.  Back to cited text no. 69
    
70.
Konishi T, Salt AN, Hamrick PE. Effects of exposure to noise on ion movement in guinea pig cochlea. Hear Res 1979;1:325-42.  Back to cited text no. 70
    
71.
Hsu CJ, Shau WY, Chen YS, Liu TC, Lin-Shiau SY. Activities of Na(+),K(+)-ATPase and Ca(2+)-ATPase in cochlear lateral wall after acoustic trauma. Hear Res 2000;142:203-11.  Back to cited text no. 71
    
72.
Yamamoto H, Shi X, Nuttall AL. The influence of loud sound stress on expression of osmotic stress protein 94 in the murine inner ear. Neuroscience 2009;158:1691-8.  Back to cited text no. 72
    
73.
Turner JG, Parrish JL, Hughes LF, Toth LA, Caspary DM. Hearing in laboratory animals: strain differences and nonauditory effects of noise. Comp Med 2005;55:12-23.  Back to cited text no. 73
    
74.
Hong J, Kim J, Lim C, Kim K, Lee S. The effects of long-term exposure to railway and road traffic noise on subjective sleep disturbance. J Acoust Soc Am 2010;12:2829-35.  Back to cited text no. 74
    
75.
Kawada T. Noise and health−sleep disturbance in adults. J Occup Health 2011;53:413-6.  Back to cited text no. 75
    
76.
Salloum RH, Yurosko C, Santiago L, Sandridge SA, Kaltenbach JA. Induction of enhanced acoustic startle response by noise exposure: dependence on exposure conditions and testing parameters and possible relevance to hyperacusis. PLoS One 2014;9:e111747.  Back to cited text no. 76
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Luca Fontana
Professor, Section of Occupational Medicine, Department of Public Health, Section of Occupational Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131
Italy
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/nah.NAH_17_20

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top