Home Email this page Print this page Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size
Noise & Health  
Read this article


    Article Cited by others


Cross-modal distraction by background speech: What role for meaning?

Marsh John E, Jones Dylan M

Year : 2010| Volume: 12| Issue : 49 | Page no: 210-216

   This article has been cited by
1 What makes background music distracting? Investigating the role of song lyrics using self-paced reading
Martin R. Vasilev, Licia Hitching, Sophie Tyrrell
Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2023; : 1
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
2 Distraction by Auditory Categorical Deviations Is Unrelated to Working Memory Capacity: Further Evidence of a Distinction between Acoustic and Categorical Deviation Effects
Katherine Labonté, John E. Marsh, François Vachon
Auditory Perception & Cognition. 2022; : 1
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
3 The effect of background speech on attentive sound processing: A pupil dilation study
Paula Ríos-López, Andreas Widmann, Aurelie-Bidet-Caulet, Nicole Wetzel
International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2022; 174: 47
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
4 Are single-word picture naming assessments a valid measure of word retrieval in connected speech?
Catherine Mason, Lyndsey Nickels
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2021; : 1
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
5 The susceptibility of compound remote associate problems to disruption by irrelevant sound: a Window onto the component processes underpinning creative cognition?
John E. Marsh, Emma Threadgold, Melissa E. Barker, Damien Litchfield, Federica Degno, Linden J. Ball
Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2021; 33(6-7): 793
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
6 The effects of masking sound and signal-to-noise ratio on work performance in Chinese open-plan offices
Yuanyuan Zhang, Dayi Ou, Shengxian Kang
Applied Acoustics. 2021; 172: 107657
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
7 The influence of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the right auditory cortex on interference effects in memory for melodies
Nora K. Schaal, Stefanie Kloos, Bettina Pollok, Steffen A. Herff
Brain and Cognition. 2021; 154: 105798
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
8 The relation between the intelligibility of irrelevant speech and cognitive performance—A revised model based on laboratory studies
Annu Haapakangas, Valtteri Hongisto, Andreas Liebl
Indoor Air. 2020; 30(6): 1130
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
9 Updating working memory in aircraft noise and speech noise causes different fMRI activations
Bjørn Saetrevik,Patrik Sörqvist
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 2014; : n/a
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
10 Auditory distraction: A duplex-mechanism account
Robert W. Hughes
PsyCh Journal. 2014; 3(1): 30
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
11 Predictability and distraction: Does the neural model represent postcategorical features?
John E. Marsh,Jan P. Röer,Raoul Bell,Axel Buchner
PsyCh Journal. 2014; 3(1): 58
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
12 Disruption of writing by background speech: The role of speech transmission index
Marijke Keus van de Poll,Robert Ljung,Johan Odelius,Patrik Sörqvist
Applied Acoustics. 2014; 81: 15
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
13 Boundaries of semantic distraction: Dominance and lexicality act at retrieval
John E. Marsh, Nick Perham, Patrik Sörqvist, Dylan M. Jones
Memory & Cognition. 2014; 42(8): 1285
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
14 Cognitive performance during irrelevant speech: Effects of speech intelligibility and office-task characteristics
Helena Jahncke,Valtteri Hongisto,Petra Virjonen
Applied Acoustics. 2013; 74(3): 307
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
15 Cognitive performance during irrelevant speech: Effects of speech intelligibility and office-task characteristics
Jahncke, H. and Hongisto, V. and Virjonen, P.
Applied Acoustics. 2013; 74(3): 307-316
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar]
16 How much does irrelevant speech impair employeesæ work performance in open-plan offices?
Helena Jahncke
Noise & Vibration Worldwide. 2013; 44(9): 10
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
17 Evidence for habituation of the irrelevant-sound effect on serial recall
Jan P. Röer,Raoul Bell,Axel Buchner
Memory & Cognition. 2013;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
18 Disruption of writing processes by the semanticity of background speech
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 2012; 53(2): 97
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
19 Open-plan office noise: The susceptibility and suitability of different cognitive tasks for work in the presence of irrelevant speech
Jahncke, H.
Noise and Health. 2012; 14(61): 315-320
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar]
20 The ineluctable modality of the audible: Perceptual determinants of auditory verbal short-term memory
Maidment, D.W. and Macken, W.J.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2012; 38(4): 989-997
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar]
21 Retrieval from memory: Vulnerable or inviolable?
Jones, D.M. and Marsh, J.E. and Hughes, R.W.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition. 2012; 38(4): 905-922
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar]
22 Disruption of writing processes by the semanticity of background speech
Sörqvist, P. and Nöstl, A. and Halin, N.
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 2012; 53(2): 97-102
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar]
23 Auditory distraction and serial memory: The avoidable and the ineluctable
Jones, D.M. and Hughes, R.W. and MacKen, W.J.
Noise and Health. 2010; 12(49): 201-209
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar]