Noise Health Home 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
[View FULLTEXT] [Download PDF]
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 83  |  Page : 185--193

Environmental propagation of noise in mines and nearby villages: A study through noise mapping

Veena D Manwar1, Bibhuti B Mandal1, Asim K Pal2 
1 Department of Occupational Hygiene, National Institute of Miners' Health, Nagpur, India
2 Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Bibhuti B Mandal
Head of the Department, Department of Occupational Hygiene, National Institute of Miners' Health, JNARDDC Campus, Amravati Road, Wadi, Nagpur 440 023
India

Background: Noise mapping being an established practice in Europe is hardly practiced for noise management in India although it is mandatory in Indian mines as per guidelines of the Directorate General of Mines Safety (DGMS). As a pilot study, noise mapping was conducted in an opencast mine with three different models; one based on the baseline operating conditions in two shifts (Situation A), and two other virtual situations where either production targets were enhanced by extending working hours to three shifts (Situation B) or only by increased mechanization and not changing the duration of work (Situation C). Methods: Noise sources were categorized as point, line, area, and moving sources. Considering measured power of the sources, specific meteorological and geographical parameters, noise maps were generated using Predictor LimA software. Results: In all three situations, Lden values were 95 dB(A) and 70–80 dB(A) near drill machine and haul roads, respectively. Noise contours were wider in Situation C due to increase in frequency of dumpers. Lden values near Shovel 1 and Shovel 2 under Situation B increased by 5 dB and 3 dB, respectively due to expansion of working hours. In Situation C, noise levels were >82 dB(A) around shovels. Noise levels on both sides of conveyor belts were in the range of 80–85 dB(A) in Situations A and C whereas it was 85–90 dB(A) in Situation B. Near crusher plants, it ranged from 80 to 90 dB(A) in Situations A and C and between 85 and 95 dB(A) in Situation B. In all situations, noise levels near residential areas exceeded the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) limits, i.e., 55 dB(A). Conclusions: For all situations, predicted noise levels exceeded CPCB limits within the mine and nearby residential area. Residential areas near the crusher plants are vulnerable to increased noise propagation. It is recommended to put an acoustic barrier near the crusher plant to attenuate the noise propagation.


How to cite this article:
Manwar VD, Mandal BB, Pal AK. Environmental propagation of noise in mines and nearby villages: A study through noise mapping.Noise Health 2016;18:185-193


How to cite this URL:
Manwar VD, Mandal BB, Pal AK. Environmental propagation of noise in mines and nearby villages: A study through noise mapping. Noise Health [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Oct 23 ];18:185-193
Available from: https://www.noiseandhealth.org/article.asp?issn=1463-1741;year=2016;volume=18;issue=83;spage=185;epage=193;aulast=Manwar;type=0