Noise Health Close
 

Figure 8 :Noise annoyance rating in subjects showing different sensitivity to noise in general and to LFN in experiment II . data concern only noise samples for which significant impact of sensitivity to noise in general was noted (mean values with 95% confidence intervals). Significant differences in annoyance rating between subjects recognized as NG+ and NG. (4.004 . F(1,66) . 6.470, 0.049 . P.0.013) were marked (.) (NG./NG+ are subjects recognized as low-/high-sensitive to noise in general, LFN./LFN+ are subjects recognized as low-/high-sensitive to LFN in particular)

Figure 8 :Noise annoyance rating in subjects showing different sensitivity to noise in general and to LFN in experiment II . data concern only noise samples for which significant impact of sensitivity to noise in general was noted (mean values with 95% confidence intervals). Significant differences in annoyance rating between subjects recognized as NG+ and NG. (4.004 . F(1,66) . 6.470, 0.049 . P.0.013) were marked (.) (NG./NG+ are subjects recognized as low-/high-sensitive to noise in general, LFN./LFN+ are subjects recognized as low-/high-sensitive to LFN in particular)