Noise Health Close
 

Figure 6 :Noise annoyance rating in subjects showing different sensitivity to noise in general and to LFN in experiment I . data concern only the noise samples for which significant impact of sensitivity to noise in general or to LFN in particular was noted (mean values with 95% confidence intervals). Significant differences in annoyance rating between subjects recognized as LFN+ and LFN. (5.289 . F(1,51) . 5.494, 0.026 . P . 0.023) were marked (.), while between subjects recognized as NG+ and NG. (4.389 . F(1,51) . 5.174, 0.041 . P . 0.027) were marked (.) (NG./NG+ are subjects recognized as low-/high-sensitive to noise in general, LFN./LFN+ are subjects recognized as low-/high-sensitive to LFN in particular)

Figure 6 :Noise annoyance rating in subjects showing different sensitivity to noise in general and to LFN in experiment I . data concern only the noise samples for which significant impact of sensitivity to noise in general or to LFN in particular was noted (mean values with 95% confidence intervals). Significant differences in annoyance rating between subjects recognized as LFN+ and LFN. (5.289 . F(1,51) . 5.494, 0.026 . P . 0.023) were marked (.), while between subjects recognized as NG+ and NG. (4.389 . F(1,51) . 5.174, 0.041 . P . 0.027) were marked (.) (NG./NG+ are subjects recognized as low-/high-sensitive to noise in general, LFN./LFN+ are subjects recognized as low-/high-sensitive to LFN in particular)